Friday, August 22, 2014

Morning Journal--The mounting economic disaster in Europe

Economics

   This Week’s Data

            The August Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index came in at 28.0 versus expectations of 20.0.

            July existing home sales rose 2.3% versus estimates of a 0.7% decline.

            The July leading economic indicators increased 0.9% versus forecasts of +0.6%

   Other

            The mounting economic disaster in Europe (medium):

            The economic outlook from an optimist (medium):

            More from Hilsenrath on Fed policy (medium):

            More data on income distribution from the Census Bureau (medium):

Politics

  Domestic

Friday morning humor (cartoon):

Welcome to Obamacare (short):

GAO says Obama broke the law (medium):

  International

            Argentine peso collapses (short):

            Russian convoy enters Ukraine (medium):

            Chuck Hagel’s assessment of ISIS (short):


The Morning Call---Yellen's speech won't change the disparity between price and value

The Morning Call

8/22/13

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 17039, S&P 1992) continued their winning streak.  The Dow closed within short (16331-17158) and intermediate (15132-17158) term trading ranges, though it keeps inching its way toward the upper boundaries of those trading ranges.  It remained above its 50 day moving average and within a long term uptrend (5101-18464).

            The S&P broke above the upper boundary of its short term trading range.  Under our Time and Distance discipline, if it remains above 1991 through the close next Monday, the break will be confirmed and the short term trend will re-set to the upside.   It finished above its 50 day moving average and within intermediate (1881-2681) and long (752-1999) term uptrends.

            Volume was up slightly; breadth remains mixed.  The VIX fell, closing within short and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.  With the S&P breaking above an all-time high, I checked our internal indicator at yesterday’s close, in a 146 stock Universe, 50 are at or above their all-time highs, 96 are not---reflecting the unusually sluggish breadth indicators.

            The long Treasury rose, finishing within a short term uptrend, an intermediate term trading range and above its 50 day moving average.

            GLD got whacked, ending within a short term downtrend, an intermediate term downtrend, at the lower boundary of the building pennant formation (a break below this trend line would only add to the negativity of GLD’s chart) and below its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line: the Dow moved closer to the upper boundaries of its short and intermediate term trading ranges; while the S&P broke above the upper boundary of its short term trading range.  A close above that level on Monday would re-set the short term trend to up.  In the meantime, the Averages are out of sync, the short term technical indicators are stretched into overbought territory and those oft mentioned divergences persist---not the least of which is our internal indicator. 

Nevertheless, the upward momentum is there; and barring a surprise from Yellen today, the indices are likely to re-set to up across all timeframes; though I continue to believe that the Averages will be unable to confirm a breach above the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends.

Our strategy remains to Sell stocks that are near or at their Sell Half Range or whose underlying company’s fundamentals have deteriorated.

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            We got more good US economic news yesterday: weekly jobless claims, the August Philly Fed manufacturing index, July existing home sales and July leading economic indicators all came in better than anticipated.  Certainly, it reinforces our forecast for the US economy.

            There was also some good international economic news with Japan reporting a five month high PMI number.  Unfortunately, it was offset by a poor Chinese PMI.  My concerns remain that global economic weakness could ultimately be one burden too much for the US economy to bear and push it into a no growth or negative growth environment. That said, there are no cracks in the system yet; so we hope for an EU and/or Japanese pick up in economic activity.

            All that said, the media pundits spent yesterday speculating on just how dovish or hawkish Yellen’s comments might be in her speech this morning and what Draghi will say in an address midafternoon. 

Bottom line: regardless of what Yellen or Draghi say, they are not going to change the disparity between current prices and our own calculations of Fair Value.  They can mew to the Markets and make most investors even more comfortable with the idea that the central banks will have their backs into infinity.  That could set up an attack by the indices on the upper boundaries of the Averages long term uptrends, widening even further that spread between prices and value. 

But in the underbelly of the Market, there is a lot of dissent as I have enumerated the multiple divergences and posted the results of our internal indicator.  Sooner or later those variances have to be reconciled---maybe not today or tomorrow and maybe the resolution is that other stocks catch up with the Averages, as unlikely as I think that is.  But the higher prices go, the more the valuation discrepancy gets stretched; and just like a rubber band, I have no way of determining when it will break.  But it will break. 

Of course, there is always some small chance that Yellen will say the right thing, to wit, the Fed needs to pick up the pace of its exit from its overly expansive monetary policy.  But she probably won’t because she knows that she will have created an emperor’s new clothes moment for the Markets---and is largely for them that QE was implemented. 

So I think that this merry-go-round will continue until some exogenous event monkey wrench gets stuck in the gears and QE policy comes unwound all by itself because no one is listening to the music. 

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.
 
            Currently, Warren Buffett likes cash (medium and a must read):

            Returns will likely go lower (medium):

            The latest from Lance Roberts (medium and today’s must read):
            http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/guest/Lance-Roberts-140821-3-Things.php

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Reliance Steel (RS) 2014 Review

Reliance Steel provides value-added metals processing services and distributes more than 100,000 metal products.  The company has grown profits and dividends at a 17-18% rate and earned a 7-19% return on equity over the last ten years.  RS operations are subject to macroeconomic forces; however, it should grow at an above average pace over a business cycle as a result of:

(1) despite slow economic growth, it is witnessing improvement in its core customer base (aerospace and energy) resulting in both rising demand and prices,

(2) acquisitions (latest: Metals USA),

(3) an excellent cost control discipline.

Negatives:

(1) the lackluster nonresidential construction market is impacting sales of carbon steel,

(2) rising raw material costs,

(3) industry overcapacity.

RS is rated B++ by Value Line, has a debt/equity ratio of approximately 35% and its stock yields 2.0%

Statistical Summary

                 Stock      Dividend         Payout      # Increases  
                Yield      Growth Rate     Ratio       Since 2004

RS             2.0%           16               22%              7
Ind Ave      2.3               7                36               NA 

                   Debt/                       EPS Down       Net        Value Line
                  Equity        ROE      Since 2004      Margin       Rating

RS              35%             11%            2                 5%           B++
Ind Ave       37                 7              NA               4             NA

       Chart

            Note: RS stock made great progress off its March 2009 low, quickly surpassing the downtrend off its June 2008 high (straight red line) and the November 2008 trading high (green line).  Long term, it is in an uptrend (blue lines).  Earlier this year, it broke its intermediate term uptrend and re-set to a trading range (purple lines).  The wiggly red line is the 50 day moving average.  The Aggressive Growth Portfolio owns a full position in RS.  The upper boundary of its Buy Value Range is $33; the lower boundary of its Sell Half Range is $95.




8/14

Morning Journal--How successful have sanctions been?

  News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

o    Hormel Foods (NYSE:HRL): FQ3 EPS of $0.51 beats by $0.03.
o    Revenue of $2.28B (+5.6% Y/Y) beats by $50M.



Economics

   This Week’s Data

            Weekly jobless claims fell 14,000 versus expectations of an 11,000 decline.

   Other

            Update on the auto loan market (medium):

            Argentina ‘crams down’ holdouts (medium):

            Brazil joins the QE club (medium):

            Update on real household incomes (medium):

Politics

  Domestic

More on the collusion of the banksters and the regulators (medium):

  International

            How successful have the sanctions been (medium)?


The Morning Call--Why did the more hawkish FOMC minutes spawn a stock rally?

The Morning Call

8/21/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16979, S&P 1986) had another good day.  The Dow remained within its short (16331-17158) and intermediate term (15132-17158) trading ranges but is clearly drawing ever closer to the upper boundaries of those ranges.  It also finished above its 50 day moving average and within a long term uptrend (5101-18464).

            The S&P also closed near the top end of its short term trading range (1814-1991).  It also remained within its intermediate (1881-2681) and long term (752-1999) uptrends and above its 50 day moving average.

            Volume again declined.  Surprisingly, breadth remained mixed.  The VIX, not surprisingly, fell, finishing within short and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.

            The long Treasury dropped again; but remained within its short term uptrend, above its 50 day moving average and within an intermediate term trading range.

            GLD continued its dismal performance, closing within a short term trading range, an intermediate term downtrend, a developing pennant formation and below its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line: the indices seem poised to bust through their former all-time highs and re-set short and intermediate term trends to the upside.  Adding credence to that assessment, I thought that the more hawkish tone in the FOMC minutes would have put a crimp in investors’ enthusiasm.  Not so.  Furthermore, the Market is way overbought; but investor euphoria reigns supreme.  So it seems likely that prices will push through those former highs (17158, 1991) today or after the Yellen speech.  Nonetheless, I remain of the belief that the Averages will be unable to confirm a breach above the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends.

Our strategy remains to Sell stocks that are near or at their Sell Half Range or whose underlying company’s fundamentals have deteriorated.

            The latest from Stock Traders’ Almanac on bull markets and corrections (short and a must read):

    Fundamental
 
     Headlines

            There was not much by way of economic data releases yesterday.  Weekly mortgage applications were up, but the more important purchase applications were down.  These numbers have little meaning following Tuesday’s terrific housing starts report.

            Overseas, Japan reported that its July trade deficit widened yet again.  I am not sure how long the Japanese electorate will put up with the failed policies of their government; but at some point, there has to be either a turnaround or a movement to correct those policies.  In the meantime, it is not great news for US companies with exposure to Japan.

            ***overnight.  Speaking of a turnaround, the Japanese July PMI surged to a five month high.  However, that was offset by a lousy Chinese PMI.

            Of course, the high point of the day was the release of the minutes of the latest FOMC meeting which I would characterize as more hawkish than the statement immediately following that meeting.  The primary reason seems to be that the improvement in the labor markets has an increasing number of Fed members wanting to start to raise interest rates sooner than previously implied.

            Summary of FOMC minutes

            Fed mouthpiece, Hilsenrath’s take (medium):

            What is important about Jackson Hole (medium)?

Bottom line: as I noted above, I was surprised that the more hawkish tone to the Fed minutes didn’t cause more heartburn for investors than it did.  Perhaps it is what I suggested yesterday, i.e. that investors have unbridled faith that the Fed will get its policy right irrespective of the rate of progress of the economy---hence any policy move will be the correct one. 

‘As you know, my mantra on this issue is that if this assumption proves correct, it will be the first time in history.  Not that it won’t; but there sufficient evidence to warrant healthy skepticism.

Or as Citi suggests, perhaps investors believe that Yellen’s Jackson Hole speech will be uber dovish and negate the impact of the FOMC minutes.

There is nothing for me to do but wait and see; and given the current lofty equity valuations, I believe cash is of inestimable worth while I do.’

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.
 
            Does it matter is stocks are currently not is a 2000 type bubble? (medium):

            Another thought on current valuation (medium):

            CAPE and math (medium and a good read):

      Investing for Survival from Warren Buffett


Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Investing for Survival---6 mistakes investors make in planning for retirement.

 Investing for Survival

            6 mistakes investors make in planning for retirement

1. I didn't save enough for retirement, and I spent more than I should have in my peak years. "You should be saving significant amounts in those peak earning years as you get closer to retirement. People see their salaries go up, and they continue to spend instead of save. People have been living beyond their means, and their retirement expectations are not realistic."
2. I leveraged myself too much during my peak earnings year. "People go out and live on credit cards," says Kehoe. "It's a terrible way to spend and live." Those who use home equity to buy a car or take a vacation often regret it, he says. "People are losing focus in that they should be saving. They over-leverage themselves and borrow too much. I teach this to all my kids. If you can't afford to pay a card off at the end of the month, you can't afford to be buying on the credit card."
3. I retired too early. The two problems with retiring too early: "You have less (time) to save, and you have a longer period of retirement that you have to provide yourself for with an inflow of income," Kehoe says.
4. Why did I take that money out of my IRA or 401(k)? "To take money out of your plan at an early age is a real killer, because that dollar you take out in your 20s compounded over 30 or 40 years, could grow into a significant amount. It's in your plan; leave it there."
5. I thought Social Security was supposed to provide for me. "A lot of people have the perception that Social Security would take care of them," Kehoe says. "It was originally part of a three-legged stool — your pension, your own savings and Social Security. People put their stock and faith in the Social Security system. Even if you believe in the Social Security system, demographically it's a bad time. When it was put in place, it was supposed to pay people at just about the expected age of death. More and more people are counting on it more and more. Ten employees were supporting every one retiree; now its three employees supporting every one retiree. There are more people on retirement and less people to pay for the system."
6. I was a picture of health in my middle age. "As we get older, the strain on our bodies increases," Kehoe says. "You can't keep up with things. It surprises a lot of people what the cost of good medical care can be. We do rely on government to take care of us, but there are outside expenses the government won't pay for. Consider long-term care insurance or some sort of supplementary insurance."
    

The latest from Art Cashin