Showing posts with label housing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label housing. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

The Morning Call--How much did those Tomahawk missiles cost us?


The Morning Call

4/17/18

The Market
         
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 24573, S&P 2677) were up yesterday on lower volume and improved breadth.  The Dow closed above the upper boundary of its very short term downtrend (if it remains there through the close today, the trend will be negated).  However, the S&P ended below its comparable trend line. Both of the Averages closed below their 100 day moving averages (now resistance).  They both remain above their 200 day moving averages.  The DJIA finished in a short term trading range but in intermediate and long term uptrends.  The S&P is in uptrends across all timeframes. The short term technical picture remains cloudy, but could potentially be improving.  Longer term, the assumption is that equity prices will continue to rise.

            The world is so safe that no one hedges anymore

            Hedge funds deleveraging (medium):
               
                The VIX was down another 5 %, finishing above the lower boundary of its very short term uptrend (if it remains there through the close today, the trend will be negated).  Still it ended above its 100 and 200 day moving averages and the lower boundary of its short term trading range.

The long Treasury was up fractionally, remaining within what is now a strong two month long bounce (very short term uptrend) off the lower boundary of its long term uptrend.   On the other hand, it continues to trade below its 100 and 200 day moving averages and in a short term downtrend.  It is starting to get squeezed between the lower boundary of its very short term uptrend and its moving averages.  A break in this narrowing range would likely point at a further move in the direction of the break.

The dollar fell, finishing below its 100 and 200 day moving averages and in an intermediate term downtrend.  UUP continues to trade in a very tight range, which is not usual when bonds are moving big directionally.

GLD was up, finishing above the lower boundary of its short term uptrend and its 100 and 200 day moving averages.  On the other hand, it has been unable to rise above its February high.
               
Bottom line: near term the direction of equity prices is in question, though that may becoming questionable, as the Dow is now challenging its short term downtrend.  As I noted last Thursday, the indices were starting to get squeezed between their very short term downtrends and their 200 day moving averages.  Yesterday’s Dow pin action may be giving a preview of how this pattern will get resolved; though to be clear, more upside follow through is needed before it is confirmed.  

The price movements in TLT, UUP and GLD of late have pointed at a weakening economy which seems to be contrary to the stock Market narrative.
           
    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s economic stats were mixed at best: the April NY Fed manufacturing index and the April housing market index were below estimates; February business inventories were in line and equaled by sales; the headline March retail sales (primary indicator) number was above expectations, though ex autos, they were in line and ex autos and gasoline were below forecasts.

            The talking heads spent most of yesterday yakking about the aftermath of last weekend’s attack on Syrian chemical facilities: debating whether the Syrian government did or did not wage chemical warfare on its citizens, press releases from all participating governments arguing the virtue of their positions/actions, etc. etc. etc.  My bottom line is that Trump makes military war like he makes trade war---a lot of talk and a little action.  To be clear, I have never understood why the US is wasting lives and treasure on this country; so the less done, the better.  Still those 100 Tomahawk missiles cost you and me something.  If it was more than a nickel, it was too much.

            An Arab fighting force: a solution that should have been in place years ago (medium):

Bottom line: the first quarter earnings season starts in earnest this week and expectations remain high for upbeat results.  As I have already noted, this has not gone unnoticed by investors.  While I think much of the good news is in stock prices, I also don’t think that there will be a lot of ‘sell on the news’ action as long as there is no negative news from other sources.

The important factors to me remain the performance of the economy (which is currently not that great), the direction of inflation (which has shown few signs of getting out of control, yet) and Fed policy (which is tightening).  That combo, historically, has not been great for stocks.

I continue to like how my portfolios are structured---half equities, half cash.

            Dividend and stock buyback growth (medium):

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ): Q1 EPS of $2.06 beats by $0.05.
Revenue of $20.01B (+12.6% Y/Y) beats by $630M.


Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US
           
            February business inventories rose 0.6%, in line: sales were also up 0.6%.

            The April housing market index came in at 69 versus estimates of 70.

            March housing starts rose 1.8% versus expectations of up 2.2%; but the February reading was revised up by 4.7%.

     International

            First quarter Chinese GDP grew 6.8%, in line.

            March Chinese retail sales were up 10.1% versus forecasts of up 9.7%; industrial production was up 6.0% versus projected +6.3%; fixed asset investment up 7.5% versus consensus of up 7.7%.

            March German economic sentiment came in at 87.9 versus estimates of 88.0.

            March UK wages rose 2.8% versus expectations of +3.0%.

    Other

            Update on big four economic indicators (medium):

            Punk loan demand (short):

            Fact check (short):

            Normalizing the Fed’s balance sheet (medium):

            More crazy pension news (medium):

            An example of the above (medium):

            The likely impact on the banks of the recent revisions in Dodd Frank (medium):

            The bullish and bearish case for oil (medium):

What I am reading today

            Thoughts from Morgan Housel (medium):
           

            Who is paying the taxes (medium):

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




Thursday, November 19, 2015

The Morning Call--Somebody's confused

The Morning Call

11/19/15

The Market
         
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 17737, S&P 2083) did another moon shot yesterday.  The Dow ended [a] above its 100 moving average, which represents support, [b] back above its 200 day moving average one day after reverting to resistance; so I am going to leave it as support, [c] within a short term trading range {16919-18148}, [c] in an intermediate term trading range {15842-18295} and [d] in a long term uptrend {5471-19343}.

The S&P finished [a] above its 100 moving average which represents support, [b] back above its 200 day moving average one day after reverting to resistance; so I am leaving as support, [c] in a short term trading range {2016-2104}, [d] in an intermediate term uptrend {1961-2754} [e] a long term uptrend {800-2161}. 

Volume fell dramatically; breadth was very positive.  The VIX (16.6) was down 11%, ending [a] back below its 100 day moving average {now resistance}; negating yesterday’s upside break, [b] back below the upper boundary of its a short term downtrend; negating yesterday’s upside break and leaving it in a downtrend and [c] in intermediate term and long term trading ranges. 
           
The long Treasury rose, closing below its 100 day moving average, now resistance but within very short term, short term and intermediate term trading ranges.

GLD was up slightly, ending [a] in a short term downtrend, [b] below its 100 day moving average, now resistance, [c] in intermediate and long term downtrends. 

The dollar continues its uptrend off its October lows, trading over its 100 day moving average and within very short term, short term and intermediate term trading ranges.

Bottom line: the Averages did a Titan III shot yesterday, on weak volume but nonetheless breaking that developing very short term downtrend.  They did so in the face of FOMC minutes released yesterday, reinforcing the probability of a December rate hike.  That was something of a surprise; although stock prices have now soared twice this week on ostensively bad news (Paris attacks on Monday, FOMC minutes yesterday).   In addition, the long Treasury and gold were up---not suggestive of rate hike (and you know how I much I respect the bond guys).

One explanation offered for yesterday’s pin action was that Market participants were enthused that the Fed felt the economy was strong enough to raise rates.  Perhaps, but surely they can read the newspapers and conclude that the economy is not that strong.  Further, the bond market’s performance did not support that view.

The most plausible explanation for this seemingly unusual behavior centers around strong seasonal factors.  Clearly, if this is correct, then the odds have gone up for a challenge of the Averages prior highs and upper boundaries of the indices long term uptrends before New Year’s---although as you know, I believe that those will be unsuccessful.  

I remain somewhat perplexed by the recent pin action.
           
    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s US datapoints were mixed in quantity but negative in quality: weekly mortgage and purchase applications were up strong but October housing starts (primary indicator) fell three times more than expected.

               ***overnight, October Japanese exports fell 2.1% while imports were down 13.4%

            In addition, the Fed released the minutes from its latest meeting.  The two most important takeaways are:

(1) it was its intent in the FOMC meeting’s accompanying statement to signal that a December rate hike was likely, though the final decision was still ‘data dependent’.  Hogwash, its final decision is not ‘data dependent’, it is ‘Market dependent’; and right now, the Market is making that decision easy.  The only question is, will my thesis be correct that a transition to normal monetary policy will be bad for the Market,

(2) consensus was that both the US and global economies were improving. I don’t even know where to start on this statement.  In these pages I record the data from both here and abroad.  I have left nothing out; indeed, I have tried to include relevant anecdotal evidence.  Nowhere in those stats can I come up with a moniker like ‘improving’.  The closest I can come is that in two of the last twelve weeks the numbers have been mixed to positive.  Granted, those two occurred fairly close together; but even if they had been spectacular---which they weren’t---that ain’t ‘improving’.

            This from Fed mouthpiece, Hilsenrath (medium):

                Goldman’s take (medium):

                The ECB also released the minutes of its last meeting.  But little surprise as it had trumpeted more QE far and wide (short):


Bottom line: staying with the notion of Market schizophrenia which I mentioned yesterday, consider the last three trading days: Monday, stocks rally on Paris tragedy because it likely reduces the odds of a December rate hike; Tuesday, stocks are flat on a rumor of a bombing Germany; Wednesday, stock are up big on lousy housing data (primary indicator), a shootout in Paris and Fed minutes that reaffirm the likelihood of a December rate hike.

            That said, I try my best to separate Market movement from any specific event or datapoint.  In other words, there could be something else occurring, not obvious to me, that drove the pin action this week.  Or it could be just noise.  Certainly, either of those explanations would better suit the Market’s performance than the more obvious event connections that I suggested above.  But I will observe that the moment the Fed minutes hit the tape yesterday, stocks kicked on the afterburners.
           
Back to the news flow, the stats here and abroad are not indicative of an improving economic outlook, irrespective of what Yellen says.  Further, as I noted yesterday, ‘it is tough for me to believe that an intensification of the global war against radical islam is good for either stocks or the economy, irrespective of what the Fed does---‘.

 But none of this is necessarily indicative of lower stock prices---as long as a poor economy, dramatically mispriced and misallocated assets and a more geopolitically unstable world are at least partially reflected in current prices.  But they are not.  In fact, if anything, prices appear to be discounting just the opposite.

The most important point is that I would use the strength to take some profits in winners and/or eliminating investments that have been a disappointment.

            Notes from Lance Roberts (medium):

      
Economics

   This Week’s Data

            Weekly jobless claims fell 5,000 versus expectations of -6,000.

            The November Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index came in at 1.9 versus estimates of 0.0.

   Other

Politics

  Domestic

Quote of the day (short):

  International War Against Radical Islam

            The cluelessness on US foreign policy (medium):






Tuesday, March 17, 2015

The Morning Call---Stocks soar on lousy data

The Morning Call

3/17/15

The Market
           
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 17977, S&P 2081) had a great day, ending within uptrends across all timeframes: short term (16783-19554, 1956-2937), intermediate term (16858-22009, 1775-2924) and long term (5369-18860, 797-2112).  They both closed above their 50 day moving averages and the upper boundary of a developing very short term downtrend---a close above this boundary today will confirm the break. 

            Volume fell; breadth improved.  The VIX fell slightly (2%) unusual for a strong up day, closing within its short term trading range and its intermediate term downtrend, below its 50 day moving average and the upper boundary of a developing pennant formation. 
           
            Update on investor sentiment (short):

            The long Treasury moved higher, finishing within its short term trading range, above its 50 day moving average but within its intermediate and long term uptrends. 

            GLD fell again, remaining within its short and intermediate term trading ranges, a very short term downtrend and below its 50 day moving average. 

Bottom line:  if the Averages confirm the break of that very short term downtrend, then I would expect another assault on the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends.  I continue to believe that those boundaries will offer too much resistance for any meaningful break to the upside.  In addition, if the technical internals remain poor, they should sap any energy for a move to higher levels.

 TLT continues to attempt to stabilize; but it is too soon to hope that it will be successful.   I have little hope for GLD, at least in the short term.

    Fundamental
   
       Headlines

            We are off to another week of lousy US economic data.  Yesterday, the March New York Fed manufacturing index was below expectations and February industrial production and capacity utilization were disappointing.  If the trend remains negative for the eighth week, I will likely lower our forecast.

            Overseas, Chinese GDP growth rate was the lowest in 20 years. Meanwhile, the Chinese shadow banking industry is making fewer loans and more Chinese stock purchases (medium and a must read):

            That Austrian bank that collapsed two weeks ago claimed its first victim (a German bank).   And that is not all:

Latest comments by Germany on Greek bail proposal (short):

            Italian bad loans at record levels (short):

So no help for us from the international community.

            ***overnight, the Bank of Japan renewed its vows with QE and the German index of investor confidence rose but considerably less than anticipated.

            Meanwhile, all eyes are on the FOMC meeting this week.  While the media portray investors as braced for the removal of ‘patience’ from the Fed statement (meaning a rate hike is nearing), yesterday’s Titan III shot was powered at least partially by the poor industrial production number (hoping/praying that a rate hike isn’t nearing).  This whole discussion and Market volatility surrounding the ‘patience’ versus ‘no patience’ issue is emblematic to me and of just how distorted investor perceptions have become.  That the Market could bounce or decline hundreds of points base on whether the Fed raises its bench mark rate from near zero to a tiny fraction above near zero is nuts. 

            In the grand scheme of things, the probability of a move or lack thereof in interest rates of magnitude being discussed has never produced a significant impact on the economy.  Now if the Fed let it be known that it was the first of many and the subsequent hikes would be much greater than the first, I can see how investors could be skittish.  However, we know Yellen et al aren’t about to do that. 

That leaves the Fed policy impact on stock prices as the most likely source of investor concern.  And it should be.  Indeed, what investors should really be worried about is the fact that all other investors are focusing on a small group of ivory tower intellects that have screwed up monetary policy (and the economy) consistently and ignoring the economic data at a time when it is turning to s**t.

Bottom line: volatility/schizophrenia have their grip on the Market with every data point being weighed on its probable effect on monetary policy.  Meanwhile, valuations are at fantasy levels, the economy looks more and more like it is rolling over and very little positive is coming out of the rest of the world whether it be economics or geopolitics. 

The problem as I see it is that there is no ‘win’ scenario.  If the Fed recognizes and confirms that the economy is weak, suddenly earnings estimates start coming down much more aggressively---and that has never been good for stocks.  If the Fed goes on and starts tightening, it will likely exacerbate the rate of economic deceleration---and that will ultimately make those earnings estimates decline even more.  Some will argue the ‘goldilocks’ scenario: the economy is just weak enough to prevent a Fed tightening but not so weak as impair the rate of growth.  Good luck with that.

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.

            The latest from Doug Kass (medium):

            The latest from John Hussman (medium):

            Dollar’s impact on the S&P from Goldman Sachs (short):

      Company Highlights

Proctor and Gamble is a major household products and cosmetics company marketing products in over 180 countries with four divisions:

(1) Beauty, Hair and Personal Care products: Old Spice, Clairol Nice ‘n Easy, Pantene, Head and Shoulders, Wella, Pert, Ivory, Safeguard, Zest, Secret, Right Guard, Whisper,

(2) Fabric Care, Home Care and Batteries: Tide, Gain, Dash, Ariel, Downy, Frebreeze, Dial, Joy, Cascade, Swiffer, Mr. Clean, Dawn, Duracell, Iams, Eukanuba,

(3) Grooming: Gillette, Mach 3, Venus, Braun, Duracell,

(4) Family, Feminine and Baby Care: Cover Girl, Max Factor, Olay, Pampers, Luvs, Charmin, Bounty, Tampax, Always and Puffs.

(5) Health Care: Crest, Oral-B, Actonel, Prilosec OTC, Vicks, Scope, Pepto-Bismol, Therm-Care, Metamucil, NyQuil and Oral B

The company has grown earnings and dividends 7-11% for the last 10 years on a 15-17% return on equity.  Management’s expects to continue this record because of:

(1) its aggressive expansion of its portfolio of brands through both acquisitions and new product development,

(2) its powerful marketing effort,

(3) expand rapidly into faster growing developing countries,

(4) emphasize a faster growing, higher margin product mix [e.g. health and beauty care products] and divest lower margin/non-core operations,

(5) generates strong cash flow to not only finance the strategy described above but to also conduct a huge stock buyback program as well as raise its dividend every year.

 Negatives:

(1) subject to commodity cost inflation and currency fluctuations,

(2) it is in an intensely competitive industry,

(3) sluggish global growth.

            PG is rated A++ by Value Line, has a 22% debt to equity ratio and its stock yields 2.9%.

Statistical Summary

                 Stock      Dividend         Payout      # Increases  
                 Yield      Growth Rate     Ratio       Since 2005

PG             2.9%          7%                 53%             10
Ind Ave      2.5            11                   46                NA 

                Debt/                       EPS Down       Net        Value Line
                Equity         ROE      Since 2005      Margin       Rating

PG            22%           18%            3                 15%          A++
Ind Ave     49              17              NA               9              NA

       Chart

            Note: PG stock made great progress off its March 2009 low, quickly surpassing the downtrend off its September 2008 high (straight red line) and the November 2008 trading high (green line).  Long term, the stock is in an uptrend (blue lines).  Intermediate term, it is in a trading range (purple lines).  Short term, it is in a downtrend (brown line).    The wiggly red line is the 50 day moving average.  The Dividend Growth Portfolio owns a full position in PG.  The upper boundary of its Buy Value Range is $87; the stock is currently on the Dividend Growth Portfolio.  The lower boundary of its Sell Half Range is $124.   



3/15

      Investing for Survival

            Eleven ideas on better investing (medium):

      News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
o    FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS): FQ2 EPS of $1.52 beats by $0.12.
o    Revenue of $247.79M (+9.2% Y/Y) beats by $1.11M.
·         ParkerVision (NASDAQ:PRKR) ended Q4 with $11.2M in cash and available-for-sale securities, down from $17M at the end of Q3. Towards the end of Q4, the company struck with litigation investment firm 1624 PV to obtain up to $7M in legal funding; $1.3M in warrant proceeds were received from 1624 during the quarter.
·         As expected, no revenue was recorded in Q4. GAAP operating expenses fell to $5.6M from Q3's $6.4M and Q4 2013's $7.9M - R&D spend totaled $2M, G&A $2.8M, and sales/marketing $694K.
·         ParkerVision's issue patent portfolio grew 11% in 2014 to 267 - 179 U.S., 88 foreign. The company has 45 pending patent applications.
·         A Markman hearing for Parkervision's suits against Qualcomm, HTC, and Samsung is set to occur this August, and a trial in August 2016.
Economics

   This Week’s Data

            February industrial production was up 0.1% versus estimates of up 0.3%; capacity utilization was 78.9 versus forecasts of 79.5.

                The National Association of Home Builders sentiment index came in at 53 versus consensus of 56.

            February housing starts fell 15.7% versus expectations of a 3.0% decline.

   Other

            Update on big four economic indicators (medium):

            Australia joins Chinese regional bank (medium):

Politics

  Domestic

  International

            The latest deal between the IMF and Ukraine (medium to long):


            Putin says that he was ready to use nukes to secure Crimea (medium):

                And turns the heat up even further (medium):





Wednesday, January 14, 2015

The Morning Call---Earnings season is not going so well

The Morning Call

1/14/15

The Market
           
    Technical

Speaking of a schizophrenic Market, yesterday witnessed its very definition with the Dow experiencing a 450 point intraday swing.  After the dust settled, the indices (DJIA 17613, S&P 2023) still closed within uptrends across all timeframes: short term (16387-19157, 1889-2251), intermediate term (16401-21570, 1729-2443) and long term (5369-18860, 783-2083); although they remained below their 50 day moving average. 

In addition, they bounced off both the upper boundary and the lower boundary of the developing pennant formation.  I have included the S&P chart.  Notice how closely the S&P intraday pin action almost exactly covered the entire gap between the aforementioned boundaries.  Also note that it traded above the high of the prior day and closed below the low of the prior day, which in technical lingo is an outside down day---a negative pattern.



            Volume was up slightly; breadth was mixed.  The VIX rose again, finishing above its 50 day moving average and within its short term trading range and intermediate term downtrend. 
           
            The long Treasury was unchanged on the day holding recent gains and ending the day within uptrends across all timeframes and above its 50 day moving average.

            GLD fell but closed within its very short term uptrend, its short term trading range and slightly below the upper boundary of its intermediate term downtrend.  As I noted yesterday a confirmed break of that upper boundary would likely mean that a bottom has been made.

Bottom line: yesterday morning it looked like the Averages were going to reclaim last Thursday’s highs bolstering the case for a positive first five days of January; then everything changed.  They bounced off the upper boundary of their pennant formations (1) failing to achieve last Thursday’s level and (2) made a second lower high in the pennant patterns.  Worse still they had an outside down day.  This all would suggest to me that stocks are in for additional downside.  Having said that, given the recent volatility, nothing would surprise me.

    Fundamental
   
            Yesterday’s US economic data was generally upbeat: the December small business optimism index was up nicely, weekly retail chain store sales rose and the US budget in December was in surplus though not quite as much as anticipated.

            Overseas, the data flow was very mixed:

(1)   Germany reported a balanced budget [leading investors to optimistically assume that this would make some EU QE more acceptable to them]; then later in the day announced that it wanted every country in the EU to balance its budget [leading to an extreme tightening of those same investors’ sphincter muscles],

(2)   China reported a better than forecast trade balance; then Tesla described its China business as weak,

***overnight, the ECJ advocate general ruled that EU QE was compatible with EU law; Russia announced a 10% budget cut, while the World Bank estimated its GDP would contract 2.9% in 2015; Abe announced his biggest budget ever but with less borrowing (thank you sales tax increase); and copper plunged to a 5 year low.

In addition, oil rallied early in the day, then plunged again.  Meanwhile, China reported that it had bought an additional five million barrels of oil in December, adding them to its strategic reserves---which begged the question, how much lower would oil prices have dropped without those purchases?

David Stockman on the ‘unmitigated positive’ of lower oil prices (medium):

            Back in the US, in another earnings related disappointment, KB Homes reported softening demand and cost price pressures.  Not a great combo, especially from within an industry sector from which investors have been expecting great things.

            Bottom line:  despite the positive economic data here and at least a dabbling of it from abroad, the news on key investment issues (EU QE, oil, earnings) was not so good.  Particularly discouraging is KB Homes the report which is more anecdotal evidence following Monday’s poor showing from Tiffany’s (consumer spending) and American Airlines (benefits of lower oil prices) that the trend in upbeat macroeconomic data maybe about to change.  Again, it would be foolish to be making predictions about this earnings season or the economy from just two days of earnings reports.  But, pay attention.

      Investing for Survival from the Sovereign Man

What follows is a continued personal perspective on some of the challenges facing today’s investor:
1. For many investors, capital preservation in real terms should be more important than capital growth in notional ones.
2. Investors – as humans – are typically loss-averse. We feel the emotional impact of equivalent gains and losses disproportionately. This does not mean we should avoid considered risks, but to invest dispassionately.
3. Investing dispassionately is difficult when most of the investment media comprise the participants in a 24/7 circus. If the business of investing is either entertaining or exciting, you’re doing it wrong.
4. The answer is obvious: turn off CNBC. (Judging by their viewing figures, plenty of investors already have.)
5. True diversification remains the last free lunch in finance.
6. Having fatally tainted monetary policy, the dismal science of economics has wrought damage across investment theory as well: ‘homo economicus’ does not actually exist, and markets will never be wholly efficient until all people are, too.
7. “The investor’s chief problem – and even his worst enemy – is likely to be himself.” (Benjamin Graham)
8. The general principles of investing are not arcane. They should begin with the avoidance of loss.
9. Starting valuation is the most important characteristic of any investment.
10. Risk is poorly defined as volatility. It is better defined as the possibility of a permanent loss of capital.
11. “Operations for profit should be based not on optimism but on arithmetic.” (Also Benjamin Graham)
12. Don’t buy poor quality investments pushed by sell-side interests; don’t overpay for quality investments.
13. The ‘equity / bond / property / cash’ paradigm struggles fundamentally in an environment where all of these asset classes appear overvalued.
14. Friends are unlikely to share their worst investment outcomes at the golf club.
15. Liquidity is overrated. For capital that can be safely committed to the longer term, it is irrelevant.
16. Private investors are often poorly served by the asset management industry.
17. The medical profession has the Hippocratic Oath: first, do no harm. The asset management profession lacks such an explicit expression of fiduciary commitment to its clients.
18. Private investors may, all things being equal, be better served by small, unlisted, private partnerships than by global, publicly listed, full service investment brands.
19. Rising compliance and regulatory pressure reduce variety in the asset management business. This is unlikely to be in the best interests of private investors.
20. When interest rates are close to all-time lows and the printing presses are running, the merits of ‘deep value,’ profitable, well-managed businesses are more than usually compelling – compared to just about any other asset or asset class.
21. Distrust anybody who claims to have all the answers. Especially today.

      News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Economics

   This Week’s Data

            The December small business optimism index came in at 100.4 versus expectations of 98.1.

            Redbook Research reported month to date retail chain store sales were up 3.8%.

            The December US budget was in surplus by $1.9 billion versus estimates of plus $3 billion.

            Weekly mortgage applications soared 49.1% and purchase were up 24.0% (lower interest rates).

            December retail sales fell 0.9% versus forecasts of -0.1%; ex autos and gas, they declined 0.3% versus consensus of +0.6%.

   Other

            The golden age of the central banker has reached a cult stage (medium):

            Will low inflation delay the Fed’s rate hike? (medium):


Politics

  Domestic

  International War Against Radical Islam