Showing posts with label the Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the Constitution. Show all posts

Friday, May 24, 2019

The Morning Call--How quickly will Trump try to rescue the Market?


The Morning Call

5/24/19

The Market
         
    Technical

The Averages (25490, 2822) had volatile day, closing down but well off their intraday lows.  Volume was up slightly but still low; breadth was negative.  However, there was only marginal damage to what are otherwise strong charts (1) the Dow challenged both MA’s, but regained its 100 DMA and closed only very slightly below its 200 DMA [now support; if it remains there through the close next Tuesday, it will revert to resistance].  The S&P finished above both its DMA’s,  (2) neither made a lower low, (3) both had gap down opens which now need to be filled and (4) the S&P’s 100 DMA has crossed above its 200 DMA---a technical plus.

As I noted in yesterday’s Morning Call, I am watching whether the indices make a lower low after having made a lower high---which they have not done  At the moment, my assumption is that the indices will challenge their all-time highs---but with lower conviction.  If the indices follow through to the downside and make a lower low, then it would negate that assumption and raise the odds that a double top has been made---a technical minus.

The VIX spiked 14 ½ %, bouncing off the lower boundary of its very short term uptrend and ending above its 100 DMA (now resistance; it if remains there through the close next Monday, it will revert to support) and right on its 200 DMA (now resistance).  All exactly the opposite of what I expected at the close on Wednesday.

The long bond was up over 1%, finishing above both MA’s, in a very short term uptrend and at another two year high.  The next resistance level is its all-time high.

             The dollar started strong, trading within nine cents of a ten year high but then backed off.  Technically speaking, it suggests the (1) the strong resistance of that ten year high and (2) the magnetic draw of those two unfilled gap up opens below current price levels.
           
            GLD was up ¾ %.  Its chart remains broken---its 100 DMA remains resistance; plus, it still hasn’t fulfilled the downside objective set by that recent head and shoulders formation.
                        https://reason.com/video/stossel-money-money-money/

Bottom line: while it looked intraday that the Averages were going to make a new lower low, they didn’t.  So, a challenge of their all-time highs remains a possibility; but if they follow through to the downside and make a new lower low, that will raise the prospect that a double top has been made.

One day does not a trend make, but yesterday’s pin action in UUP, TLT and GLD points to a weaker economy.

            Thursday in the charts.

            A naysayer on technical analysis.

            Oil in for a bumpy ride.

    Fundamental

       Headlines

Yesterday’s stats were pretty dismal: April new home sales,  the May flash manufacturing, services and composite PMI’s were below estimates as was the May Kansas City Fed manufacturing index.  The one upbeat number was weekly jobless claims.

Overseas, the May Japanese flash manufacturing PMI along with the May EU flash manufacturing, services and composite PMI’s were less than forecast.  Q1 German GDP grew in line.

            The only headlines were on trade---the Chinese said that a meeting next month between Trump and Xi unlikely.

            From Thomas Friedman: China deserves Trump.

            ***overnight, Microsoft cuts ties with Huawei

            Chinese threaten UK over anti-Huawei moves.

            Bottom line: I posed the question in yesterday’s Morning Call: when if ever will investors start to discount that there will be no trade deal in the near future.  Was yesterday’s pin action that it may be happening now?  This author thinks so.

            If so, my second question comes into play: ‘how long will it take Trump and/or the Fed to react?’
`
                 I will continue to take advantage of current lofty valuations to Sell Half of any stock in our Portfolios that trades into its Sell Half Range.


    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Medtronic (NYSE:MDT): Q4 Non-GAAP EPS of $1.54 beats by $0.07; GAAP EPS of $0.87 misses by $0.28.
Revenue of $8.15B (+0.1 Y/Y) beats by $30M.

Hormel Foods (NYSE:HRL): Q2 Non-GAAP EPS of $0.46 beats by $0.01; GAAP EPS of $0.52 beats by $0.06.
Revenue of $2.34B (+0.4% Y/Y) misses by $30M.

Home Depot (NYSE:HD) declares $1.36/share quarterly dividend, in line with previous.

Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF.B) declares $0.166/share quarterly dividend, in line with previous.

BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) declares $3.30/share quarterly dividend, in line with previous.

Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US

April new home sales fell 6.9% versus expectations of -2.8%.

The May flash manufacturing PMI came in at 50.6 versus estimates of 52.5, the services PMI was 50.9 versus 53.2 and the composite was 50.9 versus 52.

The May Kansas City Fed manufacturing index was reported at 4 versus March’s reading of 10.

April durable goods orders fell 2.1% versus consensus of -2.0%; ex transportation, they were flat versus +0.2%.

     International

            The March Japanese all industry activity index was -0.4% versus expectations of -0.2%; the April year of year core inflation rate was +0.9%, in line.
           
April UK retail sales were unchanged versus estimates of -0.3%.

    Other

            The truth about negative interest rates.

            Speaking of which, and I wish that I weren’t, another great article on the misallocation of assets resulting from Fed policy (must read):

            May steps down.

What I am reading today
                   
            Global warming; it can do anything.

                Trump plans executive order to help lower health care costs.

            One simple rule in saving for retirement.

            Quote of the day.

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




Tuesday, April 17, 2018

The Morning Call--How much did those Tomahawk missiles cost us?


The Morning Call

4/17/18

The Market
         
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 24573, S&P 2677) were up yesterday on lower volume and improved breadth.  The Dow closed above the upper boundary of its very short term downtrend (if it remains there through the close today, the trend will be negated).  However, the S&P ended below its comparable trend line. Both of the Averages closed below their 100 day moving averages (now resistance).  They both remain above their 200 day moving averages.  The DJIA finished in a short term trading range but in intermediate and long term uptrends.  The S&P is in uptrends across all timeframes. The short term technical picture remains cloudy, but could potentially be improving.  Longer term, the assumption is that equity prices will continue to rise.

            The world is so safe that no one hedges anymore

            Hedge funds deleveraging (medium):
               
                The VIX was down another 5 %, finishing above the lower boundary of its very short term uptrend (if it remains there through the close today, the trend will be negated).  Still it ended above its 100 and 200 day moving averages and the lower boundary of its short term trading range.

The long Treasury was up fractionally, remaining within what is now a strong two month long bounce (very short term uptrend) off the lower boundary of its long term uptrend.   On the other hand, it continues to trade below its 100 and 200 day moving averages and in a short term downtrend.  It is starting to get squeezed between the lower boundary of its very short term uptrend and its moving averages.  A break in this narrowing range would likely point at a further move in the direction of the break.

The dollar fell, finishing below its 100 and 200 day moving averages and in an intermediate term downtrend.  UUP continues to trade in a very tight range, which is not usual when bonds are moving big directionally.

GLD was up, finishing above the lower boundary of its short term uptrend and its 100 and 200 day moving averages.  On the other hand, it has been unable to rise above its February high.
               
Bottom line: near term the direction of equity prices is in question, though that may becoming questionable, as the Dow is now challenging its short term downtrend.  As I noted last Thursday, the indices were starting to get squeezed between their very short term downtrends and their 200 day moving averages.  Yesterday’s Dow pin action may be giving a preview of how this pattern will get resolved; though to be clear, more upside follow through is needed before it is confirmed.  

The price movements in TLT, UUP and GLD of late have pointed at a weakening economy which seems to be contrary to the stock Market narrative.
           
    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s economic stats were mixed at best: the April NY Fed manufacturing index and the April housing market index were below estimates; February business inventories were in line and equaled by sales; the headline March retail sales (primary indicator) number was above expectations, though ex autos, they were in line and ex autos and gasoline were below forecasts.

            The talking heads spent most of yesterday yakking about the aftermath of last weekend’s attack on Syrian chemical facilities: debating whether the Syrian government did or did not wage chemical warfare on its citizens, press releases from all participating governments arguing the virtue of their positions/actions, etc. etc. etc.  My bottom line is that Trump makes military war like he makes trade war---a lot of talk and a little action.  To be clear, I have never understood why the US is wasting lives and treasure on this country; so the less done, the better.  Still those 100 Tomahawk missiles cost you and me something.  If it was more than a nickel, it was too much.

            An Arab fighting force: a solution that should have been in place years ago (medium):

Bottom line: the first quarter earnings season starts in earnest this week and expectations remain high for upbeat results.  As I have already noted, this has not gone unnoticed by investors.  While I think much of the good news is in stock prices, I also don’t think that there will be a lot of ‘sell on the news’ action as long as there is no negative news from other sources.

The important factors to me remain the performance of the economy (which is currently not that great), the direction of inflation (which has shown few signs of getting out of control, yet) and Fed policy (which is tightening).  That combo, historically, has not been great for stocks.

I continue to like how my portfolios are structured---half equities, half cash.

            Dividend and stock buyback growth (medium):

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ): Q1 EPS of $2.06 beats by $0.05.
Revenue of $20.01B (+12.6% Y/Y) beats by $630M.


Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US
           
            February business inventories rose 0.6%, in line: sales were also up 0.6%.

            The April housing market index came in at 69 versus estimates of 70.

            March housing starts rose 1.8% versus expectations of up 2.2%; but the February reading was revised up by 4.7%.

     International

            First quarter Chinese GDP grew 6.8%, in line.

            March Chinese retail sales were up 10.1% versus forecasts of up 9.7%; industrial production was up 6.0% versus projected +6.3%; fixed asset investment up 7.5% versus consensus of up 7.7%.

            March German economic sentiment came in at 87.9 versus estimates of 88.0.

            March UK wages rose 2.8% versus expectations of +3.0%.

    Other

            Update on big four economic indicators (medium):

            Punk loan demand (short):

            Fact check (short):

            Normalizing the Fed’s balance sheet (medium):

            More crazy pension news (medium):

            An example of the above (medium):

            The likely impact on the banks of the recent revisions in Dodd Frank (medium):

            The bullish and bearish case for oil (medium):

What I am reading today

            Thoughts from Morgan Housel (medium):
           

            Who is paying the taxes (medium):

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




Wednesday, April 27, 2016

The Morning Call---And now the fun begins

The Morning Call

4/27/16

The Market
         
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 17990, S&P 2091) sat on the sidelines yesterday, awaiting today’s Fed meeting and tomorrow’s Bank of Japan meeting. Volume rose, breadth was weaker and the VIX continues to look like it has found a bottom.

The Dow closed [a] above its 100 day moving average, now support, [b] above its 200 day moving average, now support, [c] within a short term uptrend {17594-18549}, [c] in an intermediate term trading range {15842-18295} and [d] in a long term uptrend {5541-19413}.

The S&P finished [a] above its 100 day moving average, now support, [b] above its 200 day moving average, now support, [c] within a short term uptrend {2090-2192}, [d] in an intermediate term trading range {1867-2134} and [e] in a long term uptrend {800-2161}. 

The long Treasury was off again, drawing ever closer to its 100 day moving average.  A break below that MA would be a negative and heighten the risk that inflation could be raising its head.

GLD rose, finishing within in a short term uptrend and above its 100 day moving average and a key Fibonacci level.  This pin action also suggests investors are starting to worry about inflation.

Bottom line:  the indices took a break ahead of today’s Fed meeting.  There is nothing in the technicals to alter my assumptions: stocks are in heavily congested territory, so the upward progress will be more plodding but I expect them to challenge their all-time highs and fail.

            Sell in May and go away? (medium):

    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s economic releases were mixed to negative: the April Richmond Fed manufacturing index was above estimates, the February Case Shiller home price index was in line, while April consumer confidence was less than anticipated and March durable goods orders (primary indicator) were very subpar.   Nothing from abroad.        

            ***overnight, first quarter UK GDP growth slowed but April German consumer confidence rose.

            The excitement will start this afternoon with the release of the FOMC statement.  I say excitement; actually expectations are that the tone and substance of the Fed policy is unlikely to change.  Still, Fed days always get investors all atwitter; so we should see some pickup in activity this afternoon. 

            How the Fed ignored the Constitution (medium):

            To be followed soon thereafter by the Bank of Japan, which meets tomorrow (actually tonight in the US).  There should be more fireworks coming out of this meeting because the BOJ has been signaling more easing but without revealing its extent.  That should mean a wider spread in expectations and, hence, a larger likelihood of either disappointing or exceeding them.  That said, however little the increase in easing, it is still just digs the BOJ in a deeper policy hole.     

Bottom line: the economic data remains negative.  This earnings season is not exactly inspiring (but as the optimist would say, earnings are beating lowered expectations).   The central bankers don’t get it.  Indeed, the only questions before investors are how deep the bulls**t will be coming out of today’s Fed meeting and to what additional extremes the Japanese are willing to go in order to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they will to go down in that annuals of economic history as the perpetuators of one of the most economically destructive monetary policies ever.

            My thought today is for investors with less than a $1,000,000 portfolio to focus, at least, a majority of their assets in exchange traded funds (ETF).  These are funds that offer a (relatively) passive managed diversified portfolio of securities that may reflect an index (e.g. S&P 500), or an industry segment (e.g. energy), or a country (e.g. Germany) or geographic area (e.g. Europe) or, in the case of bonds, a quality range (investment grade, junk), or a geographic exposure (EU bonds) or……….you get the picture.  They can offer exposure as broad or specialized as you may want. 

            Their advantages are:

(1)   cost: management fees are, generally, quite inexpensive; the investor is not stuck with paying higher broker commissions on a large number of small trades; and they are largely passively managed, which is to say, the funds themselves don’t do a lot of trading, again avoiding broker commissions,

(2)   choice: the ETF world has virtually every country, industrial sector, investment strategy sliced and diced so that you can structure your assets exactly as you want.  You decide how much of your portfolio is invested in bonds versus stocks, foreign versus US securities, etc.

(3)   diversification: they allow you to buy a well-diversified exposure no matter how much you may want to own.  For instance, I may want to own a five percent position in US REIT’s.  But if I have a $500,000 portfolio, that is a $25,000 holding.  From a cost effective perspective, that means I have to choice one REIT if I want a direct participation.  However, I can buy $25,000 of the Vanguard REIT ETF and that helps diversify away the specific risk of owning single stock.

All you have to do is allocate how you want your assets invested, then go to sites like ETF.COM and select those ETF’s that fit your goal.  You can also go to our site to see how we structure our ETF Portfolio and the ETF’s that Portfolio owns.

       Investing for Survival
   
            The emotional and psychological risks in investing.

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL): FQ2 EPS of $1.90 misses by $0.10.
Revenue of $50.6B (-12.8% Y/Y) misses by $1.37B.


AT&T (NYSE:T): Q1 EPS of $0.72 beats by $0.03.
Revenue of $40.5B (+24.3% Y/Y) in-line.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW): Q1 EPS of $0.83 beats by $0.01.
Revenue of $3.07B (-7.0% Y/Y) misses by $100M.



Boeing (NYSE:BA): Q1 EPS of $1.74 misses by $0.09.
Revenue of $22.63B (+2.2% Y/Y) beats by $1.19B


General Dynamics (NYSE:GD): Q1 EPS of $2.34 beats by $0.18.
Revenue of $7.72B (-0.8% Y/Y) beats by $30M.


United Technologies (NYSE:UTX): Q1 EPS of $1.47 beats by $0.08.
Revenue of $13.36B (+0.3% Y/Y) beats by $180M


Economics

   This Week’s Data

            Month to date retail chain store sales grew more than in the prior week.

            The February Case Shiller home price index was up 0.7%, in line.

            April consumer confidence came in at 94.2 versus expectations of 96.0

            The April Richmond Fed manufacturing index was reported at 14 versus estimates of 12.

                Weekly mortgage applications fell 4.1% while purchase applications dropped 2.0%.

            The March US traded deficit came in at $56.9 billion versus consensus of $62.6 billion.

   Other

Politics

  Domestic

Thoughts on crime and punishment (short):

  International War Against Radical Islam

            More on the Saudi’s, the production cut and 9/11 (medium):


Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




Tuesday, November 17, 2015

The Morning Call--The Paris attack brings out the bulls

The Morning Call

11/17/15

The Market
         
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 17483, S&P 2053) staged a major comeback yesterday after two rough days in the Market.  The Dow ended [a] above its 100 moving average, which represents support, [b] below its 200 day moving average for a third day, now support; but if it remains below this MA through the close today, it will revert to resistance, [c] within a short term trading range {16919-18148}, [c] in an intermediate term trading range {15842-18295} and [d] in a long term uptrend {5471-19343}.

The S&P finished [a] back above its 100 moving average {which represents support}, negating Friday’s challenge, [b] below its 200 day moving average for a third day, now support; if it remains below this MA through the close today, it will revert to resistance, [c] in a short term trading range {2016-2104}, [d] in an intermediate term uptrend {1961-2754} [e] a long term uptrend {800-2161}. 

Volume rose; breadth improved.  The VIX (18) was down 10%, ending [a] back below above its 100 day moving average {now resistance}, negating Friday’s upside challenge, [b] back below the upper boundary of its a short term downtrend, negating Friday’s challenge and [c] in intermediate term and long term trading ranges. 
           
The long Treasury fell slightly, closing below its 100 day moving average, now resistance but within very short term, short term and intermediate term trading ranges.

GLD was up fractionally, ending [a] below the lower boundary of its short term trading range for a second day; if it remains there through the close today, it will re-set to a downtrend, [b] below its 100 day moving average, now resistance, [c] in intermediate and long term downtrends. 

Bottom line: stocks closed last Friday modestly oversold, so a bounce yesterday was not that unexpected.  That said, given the events in Paris, most investors probably would have bet on a down Monday in the Market---which luckily most couldn’t do.  There are likely multiple reasons for this performance aside from the Market’s oversold condition: (1) a very strong positive seasonal bias and (2) a decline in the odds of a December rate hike [see below] although that reasoning was not supported by the pin action in bonds---which, as you know, I pay a lot of attention to.   My conclusion: I am a little confused/nervous made all the worse by the big swings in volatility.  I continue to watch for follow through, one way or the other.

    Fundamental

       Headlines

            We received one datapoint yesterday: the November NY Fed manufacturing index was well below estimates.  There was also a negative anecdotal stat: imports at the three largest US ports fell in both September and October.

            Overseas, the news wasn’t any better: Japanese third quarter GDP fell and the second quarter figure was revised down; in addition, the ECB said that nine large EU banks have a cumulative capital shortfall of $1.9 billion.

            ***overnight, October UK inflation was reported at -0.1% while factory output down 1.3%; copper prices continue to crash.

            Of course, most of the air time, newspaper ink and on line blogging was dedicated to last weekend’s attack in Paris.  Not to ignore the tragedy; but this is a financial blog--- my take is that if the Fed wants to use it, it has been handed a ‘get out of jail free’ card on the December rate hike---which is to say, that if the economic numbers continue to come in subpar, the Fed can use whatever economic disruptions occur as a result of the Paris attack as an excuse to not raise rates.  Indeed, I think that at least part of the driving force in Monday’s price advance was the lessening of odds of such a hike.   

That said, [a] if there were widespread consensus on that view, then the long Treasury would have been up {it was down} and [b] not to beat a dead horse, the Fed isn’t watching the economy, it is watching the Market; and however ironic it may be, if the Market continues to rally, I think that the Fed will go through with the rate increase.   

Bottom line: the US may or may not be stabilizing at a lower rate of economic growth.  However, global economies continue to deteriorate; and Paris attack’s potential negative impact on travel and tourism will likely only make matters worse. 

To date, the Fed has ostensively ignored this data and chosen to push the line that ‘all is well’.  So unless we get some absolutely horrendous economic news that can’t be painted in a more favorable light or the Market tanks, I believe that the Fed will stay on course to raise rates in December.   My conclusion hasn’t changed: whenever the Fed starts to normalize monetary policy, Market pain will be incurred; and the longer it waits, the greater the pain.

The most important point is that I would use the strength to take some profits in winners and/or eliminating investments that have been a disappointment.

            Gundlach doubts a December rate hike (short):

            Japan and QE (medium):

       Investing for Survival
   
            Why indexing works:
           
    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Economics

   This Week’s Data

            October CPI rose 0.2%, in line; ex food and energy, it was also up 0.2%, also in line.

   Other

Politics

  Domestic

This is what higher education in the US has come to (medium):

  International War Against Radical Islam

            ISIS next step (short):
            Ron Paul on Paris (medium):
Tuesday morning humor (2 minute video):