Friday, April 25, 2014

Thoughts on Investing from Paul Tudor Jones

  Thoughts on Investing from Paul Tudor Jones

1. Markets have consistently experienced “100-year events” every five years. While I spend a significant amount of my time on analytics and collecting fundamental information, at the end of the day, I am a slave to the tape and proud of it.

2. I see the younger generation hampered by the need to understand and rationalize why something should go up or down. Usually, by the time that becomes self-evident, the move is already over.

3. When I got into the business, there was so little information on fundamentals, and what little information one could get was largely imperfect. We learned just to go with the chart. Why work when Mr. Market can do it for you?

4. These days, there are many more deep intellectuals in the business, and that, coupled with the explosion of information on the Internet, creates an illusion that there is an explanation for everything and that the primary task is simply to find that explanation. As a result, technical analysis is at the bottom of the study list for many of the younger generation, particularly since the skill often requires them to close their eyes and trust price action. The pain of gain is just too overwhelming to bear.

5. There is no training — classroom or otherwise — that can prepare for trading the last third of a move, whether it’s the end of a bull market or the end of a bear market. There’s typically no logic to it; irrationality reigns supreme, and no class can teach what to do during that brief, volatile reign. The only way to learn how to trade during that last, exquisite third of a move is to do it, or, more precisely, live it.

6. Fundamentals might be good for the first third or first 50 or 60 percent of a move, but the last third of a great bull market is typically a blow-off, whereas the mania runs wild and prices go parabolic.

7. That cotton trade was almost the deal breaker for me. It was at that point that I said, ‘Mr. Stupid, why risk everything on one trade? Why not make your life a pursuit of happiness rather than pain?’

8. If I have positions going against me, I get right out; if they are going for me, I keep them… Risk control is the most important thing in trading. If you have a losing position that is making you uncomfortable, the solution is very simple: Get out, because you can always get back in.

9. Losers average down losers

10. The concept of paying one-hundred-and-something times earnings for any company for me is just anathema. Having said that, at the end of the day, your job is to buy what goes up and to sell what goes down so really who gives a damn about PE’s?

11. The normal progression of most traders that I’ve seen is that the older they get something happens. Sometimes they get more successful and therefore they take less risk. That’s something that as a company we literally sit and work with. That’s certainly something that I’ve had to come to grips with in particular over the past 12 to 18 months. You have to actively manage against your natural tendency to become more conservative. You do that because all of a sudden you become successful and don’t want to lose what you have and/or in my case you get married and have children and naturally, consciously or subconsciously, you become more conservative.

12. I look for opportunities with tremendously skewed reward-risk opportunities. Don’t ever let them get into your pocket – that means there’s no reason to leverage substantially. There’s no reason to take substantial amounts of financial risk ever, because you should always be able to find something where you can skew the reward risk relationship so greatly in your favor that you can take a variety of small investments with great reward risk opportunities that should give you minimum draw down pain and maximum upside opportunities.


13. I believe the very best money is made at the market turns. Everyone says you get killed trying to pick tops and bottoms and you make all your money by playing the trend in the middle. Well for twelve years I have been missing the meat in the middle but I have made a lot of money at tops and bottoms.

The Morning Call--Just what the bulls ordered

The Morning Call

4/25/14
The Market
           
    Technical

The indices (DJIA 16501, S&P 1878) continued to rest yesterday.  Technically speaking, when stocks work off an overbought condition by going sideways versus correcting to the downside, that is a positive sign for the bulls.  The S&P closed within uptrends across all timeframes: short (1816-1993), intermediate (1770-2570) and long (739-1910).  The Dow remains within short (15330-16601) and intermediate (14696-16601) term trading ranges and a long term uptrend (5055-17405).  While they continue out of sync in their short and intermediate term trends, the Dow remains close to the upper boundary of its short/intermediate term trading range (s).

Volume was flat, breadth mixed.  The VIX rose slightly, remaining within its short term trading range, its intermediate term downtrend and below its 50 day moving average.

The long Treasury was up again, finishing within its short term uptrend, above its 50 day moving average and within an intermediate term downtrend.

GLD managed an up day, but closed within short and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50day moving average.

Bottom line:  the Averages are working off their overbought position exactly like the bulls would have it---even as the news flow remains unsettling.  If this pattern holds, I think it increases the odds of a move to challenge the upper boundaries of the indices’ long term uptrends (17405/1910); though as I have noted, they must still move through their former all-time highs (16601/1898). However, as I have also noted, if the current Market divergences keep growing, I think that the indices will be unable to break above those levels.

Meanwhile, we have a trendless Market; so there is really not much to do save using any price strength that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly.

            Interesting (short):

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            Yesterday’s US economic news was…….you guessed it…. mixed: weekly jobless claims were a disappointment, the April Kansas City Fed manufacturing index was slightly less than anticipated and March durable goods were much stronger than expected.   Do I need to give my conclusion?

            Overseas:

(1)   the ECB promised asset purchases if necessary.  Because of its recent monetary austerity, I opined that it has room to do so assuming that it doesn’t follow the Bernanke/Abe model.  That said, the EU has more problems than just a stagnant economy.  Its grossly indebted sovereigns and overleveraged banks pose as great if not greater risks as a zero growth economy.  Asset purchases will do nothing to lessen those difficulties,

(2)   the Chinese yuan continues to fall; and that is a big problem for the carry trade:

(3)    and fighting broke out in Ukraine:
                
Bottom line: in the last eight trading sessions, investors are saying that they are either not concerned about a confusing Fed policy, a fiscal policy that is more a function of the election than the economy, turmoil in the Japanese, Chinese and European economies and the potential for further Russian aggression in Ukraine or they are all priced in. 

As I said yesterday, it is pointless to argue with either notion.  Price is reality and prices are up.  However, our Valuation Model as it is applied to individual stocks is giving us precious few choices of stocks to buy and a host of stocks that are near or within their Sell Half Ranges---and those calculations reflect little of the aforementioned risks.  In other words, it doesn’t matter if investors are ignoring or pricing in those risks, individually stocks are overvalued in either case.  Hence, by extension, stocks in aggregate (the Market) faces a terrible risk (Fair Value, as calculated by our Model)/reward (upper boundaries of the Averages long term uptrends) equation. 

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.
               
            Dividends and valuation (short):

            The latest from Doug Kass (medium):
            http://www.thestreet.com/story/12679960/1/kass-money-doesnt-talk-it-swears.html

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Caterpillar (CAT) 2014 Review

Caterpillar is the world’s largest producer of earth moving equipment serving the road building, mining, logging, agriculture, petroleum and general construction industries.  The company has earned an 11-40% return on equity over the past ten years growing earnings and dividends at a 10-19% annual rate.  While the CAT’s profitability is economically sensitive, longer term the company should prosper as a result of:

(1) strict cost controls.

(2) improving growth in end markets,

(3) stock buy backs.

 Negatives

            (1) declining backlog,

            (2) an ongoing inventory correction.

CAT is rated A+ by Value Line, has larger than desirable debt to equity ratio of 61% and its stock yields 2.5%. 

   Statistical Summary

                  Stock      Dividend        Payout      # Increases  
                  Yield      Growth Rate     Ratio       Since 2004

CAT          2.5%            5%             35%              10
Ind Ave      1.7               4                16                 NA 

                Debt/                        EPS Down       Net        Value Line
                Equity         ROE      Since 2004      Margin       Rating

CAT          61%           22%           2                  8%           A+
Ind Ave     35               15             NA               7             NA

     Chart

            Note: CAT stock made good progress off its March 2009 low, surpassing the downtrend off its May 2008 high (straight red line) and the November 2008 trading high (green line).  Long term the stock is in an uptrend (blue lines).  Intermediate term it is in a trading range (purple lines).  Short term it is an uptrend (brown lines).  The wiggly red line is the 50 day moving average.  The High Yield Portfolio owns a 50% position in CAT, having Sold Half in early 2011.  The upper boundary of its Buy Value Range is $36; the lower boundary of its Sell Half Range is $114.

   


4/14

Morning Journal

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

o    United Parcel Service (UPS): Q1 EPS of $0.98 misses by $0.11.
o    Revenue of $13.78B (+2.6% Y/Y) misses by $130M.

o    T. Rowe Price (TROW): Q1 EPS of $1.05 beats by $0.01.
o    Revenue of $954.6M (+17.0% Y/Y) beats by $6.24M.
·         Coca-Cola (CCE): Q1 EPS of $0.46 beats by $0.02.
·         Revenue of $1.87B (+1.1% Y/Y) misses by $60M.

    • Caterpillar (CAT): Q1 EPS of $1.61 beats by $0.39.
    • Revenue of $13.24B (+0.2% Y/Y) beats by $100M.
|7:34 AM|
    • 3M (MMM): Q1 EPS of $1.79 misses by $0.01.
    • Revenue of $7.83B (+2.6% Y/Y) misses by $130M.
    • Altria (MO): Q1 EPS of $0.57 in-line.
    • Revenue of $5.52B (-0.2% Y/Y) beats by $1.49B.

o    Qualcomm (QCOM): FQ2 EPS of $1.31 beats by $0.09.
o    Revenue of $6.37B (+4% Y/Y) misses by $110M.
o    188M MSM chip shipments, in-line with guidance of 180M-195M.
o    Expects FQ3 revenue of $6.2B-$6.8B and EPS of $1.15-$1.25 vs. a consensus of $6.59B and $1.25, and MSM chip shipments of 198M-213M.
o    Expects FY14 revenue of $26B-$27.5B and EPS of $5.05-$5.25 vs. a consensus of $26.8B and $5.13. EPS guidance was previously at $5-$5.20.|7:32 AM

    • Sigma-Aldrich (SIAL): Q1 EPS of $1.06 beats by $0.03.
    • Revenue of $689M (+2.1% Y/Y) misses by $1.6M.

Economics

   This Week’s Data

            March new home sales fell 14.4% versus expectations of an increase of 3.4%:

            The April Markit Flash PMI came in at 55.4 versus estimates of 56.3.

            Weekly jobless claims rose 24,000 versus forecasts of up 9,000.


            March durable goods orders advanced 2.6% versus consensus of +2.0%; ex transportation, they were up 2.0% versus expectations of up 0.9%.

The Morning Call---When all news is good news, don't argue

The Morning Call

4/24/14

The Market
           
    Technical

After lifting well into overbought territory, the indices (DJIA 16501, S&P 1875) took a breather yesterday.  Both remained above their 50 day moving average and the last lower high (16484, 1873).  This was a very docile performance given the magnitude of its overbought condition and suggests a decent bid under the Market.  The S&P closed within uptrends across all timeframes: short (1813-1990), intermediate (1770-2570) and long (739-1910).  The Dow remains within short (15330-16601) and intermediate (14696-16601) term trading ranges and a long term uptrend (5055-17405).  They continue out of sync in their short and intermediate term trends; but clearly the Dow remains close to the upper boundary of its short/intermediate term trading range (s).

Volume was down slightly; breadth deteriorated.  The VIX rose fractionally, finishing within its short term trading range, its intermediate term downtrend and below its 50 day moving average.

The long Treasury rose, closing within a short term uptrend, above its 50 day moving average and within an intermediate term downtrend.  As a reminder, the very positive recent pin action of TLT suggests deflation/recession or a flight to safety (Ukraine).

GLD continues to trade dreadfully.  It remains in short and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.  

Bottom line:  I think yesterday’s mild pullback from a very overbought condition and in the face of lousy economic numbers both here and abroad was a positive tell on the Market; that is, there is still buying momentum though the internal data suggests that that investors are focusing on fewer and fewer stocks.  While the Averages still need to bust through their former all-time highs (16601/1898), the odds seem to favor an assault on the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends.  Nevertheless, if the current Market divergences keep growing, I think that the indices will be unable to break above those levels.

Meanwhile, we have a trendless Market; so there is really not much to do save using any price strength that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly.

            Sell in May and go away (short):

            Close to a Dow Theory buy signal (short):

            Update on sentiment (short):

    Fundamental
    
       Headlines

            Yesterday’s US economic news was mostly negative: weekly mortgage and purchase applications were down, the April Markit PMI was disappointing and March new home sales were absolutely terrible.  They clearly don’t support our outlook; but this was one day’s data, so nothing to be concerned about for the time being.

            Overseas, the EU April PMI rose but Chinese manufacturing fell.  In addition, concerns continue to rise about the Chinese real estate market.

            Meanwhile, no lessening in the tensions in Ukraine:

                ***overnight, the ECB promised asset purchases (again) if necessary, the Chinese yuan fell (again) and fighting broke out in Ukraine (again).

                And:

Bottom line: economic and political events seem to have no impact on investor psychology.  Good news, bad news; it is all the same.  Momentum is up; and there is no point in arguing.  Certainly, the continuing sluggish improvement in the US economy helps; but it is facing some pretty stiff headwinds both domestically (the politicians, the bureaucrats and the Fed) and internationally (China, Japan, the EU, Ukraine). 

The Market faces an added hurdle: a terrible risk (Fair Value, as calculated by our Model)/reward (upper boundaries of the Averages long term uptrends) equation. 

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.
               
            The Fed’s disastrous monetary policy and those who benefit/suffer (medium):

            Where the consensus stands (medium and today’s must read):






Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.


Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Morning Journal---The EU and austerity

  News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

o    Boeing (BA): Q1 EPS of $1.76 beats by $0.20.
o    Revenue of $20.46B (+8.3% Y/Y) misses by $100M.


o    Procter & Gamble (PG): FQ3 EPS of $1.04 beats by $0.03.
o    Revenue of $20.56B (-0.2% Y/Y) misses by $120M.

o    General Dynamics (GD): Q1 EPS of $1.71 beats by $0.07.
o    Revenue of $7.32B (-1.1% Y/Y) beats by $120M.

o    Canadian National Railway Company (CNI): Q1 EPS of C$0.66 beats by C$0.04.
o    Revenue of C$2.69B (+8.9% Y/Y) beats by C$60M.
·         C. R. Bard, Inc. (BCR): Q1 EPS of $1.91 beats by $0.28.
·         Revenue of $799.3M (+8.0% Y/Y) beats by $12.2M.

·         AT&T (T): Q1 EPS of $0.71 beats by $0.01.
·         Revenue of $32.47B (+3.5% Y/Y) in-line.
·         Genuine Parts (GPC): FQ4 EPS of $1.02 in-line.
·         Revenue of $3.62B (+13.1% Y/Y) beats by $10M.

o    Illinois Tool Works (ITW): Q1 EPS of $1.01 beats by $0.03.
o    Revenue of $3.57B (-11.0% Y/Y) in-line.
|8:02 AM|

o    McDonald's (MCD): Q1 EPS of $1.21 misses by $0.03.
o    Revenue of $6.7B (+1.4% Y/Y) misses by $30M.

Economics

   This Week’s Data

            The International Council of Shopping Centers reported weekly sales of major retailers up .4% versus the prior week and up 1.9% on a year over year basis; Redbook Research reported month to date retail chain store sales down 0.5% versus the comparable period a month ago but up 3.7% versus the similar timeframe last year.

            March existing home sales fell 0.2% versus expectations of a 0.8% decline.

            The April Richmond Fed manufacturing index came in at 7 versus estimates of 0.

                Weekly mortgage applications were down 3.3% while purchase applications dropped 3.0%.

   Other

            Banks now accepting 3% down payment on mortgages (medium):

Politics

  Domestic

The real problem is inept governance (medium):

More cronyism (medium):

Has the Volcker Rule been Swiss cheesed? (medium):

From my favorite liberal (short):

Update on student loans (medium):

  International

            Happy Earth Day (medium):

            The EU and austerity (medium):