Monday, February 26, 2024

Monday Morning Chartology

 

The Morning Call

 

2/26/24

 

The Market

         

    Technical

 

The S&P continued its positive performance albeit with a minor hiccup. I covered most of the action in last week’s Morning Calls. But to summarize (1) the S&P fell out of a wedge formation but, (2) recovered from the challenge one day longer than our time and distance discipline calls for, (3) surged above the upper boundary of that wedge formation [the upper boundary of its short term uptrend], (4) but did so on a huge gap up open---which as you know, I believe has to be filled. 

 

Overall, I think this pin action a positive for, at least, the short term. Certainly, there is no overhead resistance except at a truly extended level (~6700). On the other hand, (1) we have two stocks that are nearing their Sell Half levels [though admittedly these start to occur well before a Market peak], (2) that gap up open may act as an anchor to upside momentum and (3) as per the links below, Market technicians are sounding warning signals.

 

Bottom line. Momentum remains to the upside, at least short term. I continue to hold the IWN trading position.

 

            Dow divergences.

            https://allstarcharts.com/140-year-old-strategy-is-working/

 

            More divergences.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/market-cracks-below-surface-collapsing-big-money-breadth-marks-growing-bearish-divergence

 

            Potential blow off top.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/markets-general-dynamic-looks-potential-blow-top-nomura-warns

 

                The latest from Goldman.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-trader-stocks-all-time-high-markets-riskreward-profile-has-changed

 

            More from Goldman.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/the-market-ear/not-even-1999-yet

 


 


The long bond was up on the week, managing to bounce off its 100 DMA. Nevertheless, it made a new lower low; so the trend remains to the downside (higher rates).

 

 


 

 

 

GLD had a great week, rallying off its 100 DMA (now support) and beginning a challenge of its 50 DMA (if it remains there through the close today, it will revert to support). On the negative side, it made a large gap up open on Tuesday which needs to be filled. Despite this very positive one week performance, it remains in a short term downtrend. As has been my position for the last four months, until GLD can break above its all-time high, I still see no reason to dabble.

       

 

 

 


 

 

While the dollar’s long term uptrend remains in place, its short term technical picture has been wrecked. To be sure, a gap down open of the order of magnitude shown on the chart begs to be closed. And that is what has been happening since its low in late December. However, last week, the dollar’s advance showed some signs of tiring. As it approached the upper boundary of its short t term downtrend and both its 100 and 200 DMA’s (heavy resistance), it failed to hold the minor uptrend off its December low. Let’s see what kind of follow through we get; remember a weak dollar is generally good for equities.

 

 


 

            Friday in the charts.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/best-week-bullion-2024-mega-caps-melt-bad-breadth

 

    Fundamental

 

       Headlines

 

              The Economy

 

                        Week in review

 

It was a slow week for economic data. The stats in the US were pretty evenly divided as were the primary indicators (one positive, one negative). So, nothing there to prompt any kind of change on outlook nor to relieve concerns that the brief string of upbeat numbers may have been just that---brief. In short, no reason to back off my recession call.

 

One item worth mentioning: the minutes from the last FOMC meeting were more hawkish than anticipated. That in turn has altered the Street narrative, (1) now at least considering that the next Fed move could be to raise rates versus lower them, (2) certainly modifying the rate cut story line to ‘fewer for longer’, but (3) suggesting that my recession forecast is off base, irrespective of the data flow.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-22/senior-fed-officials-bolster-case-for-cautious-approach-to-interest-rate-cuts?srnd=premium&embedded-checkout=true&sref=loFkkPMQ

 

Two issues remain:

 

First, at least for me, is that inflation may not be behind us as I had thought which means the Fed (if you believe its current narrative) could stay tighter for even longer keeping the risk of recession omnipresent for much longer.

 

On the other hand, if you are a cynic like me, you can’t help but think that the Fed will ease (for political reasons) whether it has conquered inflation or not.

 

Second, I (and most of the rest of the universe) believed that we were getting clarity on the question of recession/landing, i.e., that the economy would avoid a hard landing. Last week’s stats certainly raises doubts.

 

Bottom line:

 

(1)   Unfortunately, the inflation risk may not be behind us as per my current forecast. I am not altering it yet but clearly [the Fed thinks that it might be] it is now in question. And any further data suggesting that it is not will likely prompt a change. That, in turn, would amplify the impact of a grossly irresponsible fiscal policy which if left unresolved will ultimately push interest rates and inflation to even higher levels, risking a tighter monetary policy and impeding the economy’s ability to grow.

                              

(2)   Just as unfortunate, the question of recession [what kind of landing] which appeared to be gaining clarity, remains a bit murky. Of course, my forecast had been for some type of growth problem which I was considering changing. Last week’s stats increases my hesitation to do so.

                                               

                        US

 

                        International

 

                        Other

 

            The Fed

 

              The ECB can afford less restrictive stance by summer.

  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-23/ecb-can-afford-less-restrictive-stance-from-summer-simkus-says?srnd=premium&embedded-checkout=true&sref=loFkkPMQ

 

 

            Recession

 

              Two January recession indicators.

              https://econbrowser.com/archives/2024/02/cfnai-for-january-wei-for-mid-february

 

              Weekly recession alert indicator.

              https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2024/02/23/recession-weekly-leading-economic-index

 

              The mortgage delinquency rate fell in January.

              https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2024/02/ice-mortgage-delinquency-rate-decreased.html

 

            Government Shutdown

 

              Shutdown fears grow.

              https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4484048-gop-shutdown-fears-grow-we-could-be-in-a-world-of-hurt/

 

     Bottom line

 

            The latest from BofA.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/harnett-how-trade-coming-end-us-exceptionalism

 

            Using macroeconomics to aid in investing.

            https://disciplinefunds.com/2024/02/21/how-to-use-macroeconomic-investing-analysis/

 

            The newest ‘it’s different this time’ argument. As always, it’s probably not.

            https://www.capitalspectator.com/will-ai-compensate-for-a-low-expected-equity-risk-premium/

 

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

 

 

 

What I am reading today

 

            How to keep your memory sharp (avoid dementia)

                Want to keep your memory sharp? Here’s what science recommends. (nationalgeographic.com)

 

            The seven most exciting archeological finds in 2023.

            7 of the most exciting archaeological discoveries in 2023 (nationalgeographic.com)

 

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment