Wednesday, April 19, 2023

The Morning Call---Howard Marks on 'moral hazard'

 

The Morning Call

 

4/19/23

 

The Market

         

    Technical

 

            Tuesday in the charts.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/us-sovereign-risk-nears-record-high-yield-curve-screams-recession-vixtermination-continues

 

            The pain trade is higher.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/pain-trade-higher-already-catastrophic-sentiment-turns-apocalyptic-waiting-cre-shockwave

 

            Another technical indicator giving bullish signals.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/signal-flashes-was-bullish-last-nine-times

 

Note: have you noticed that growing number of articles that I have linked to on how the technical setup is getting more positive and expectations are for a run to the upside---but nothing happens.  Is that itself a signal?

 

            Update on margin debt.

            https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2023/04/18/margin-debt-up-3-4-in-march

 

Investors bet the dollar will continue to fall.

https://www.ft.com/content/c11dca60-fbaa-41f8-bae8-ee287bae9540

 

The dollar is not losing its status anytime soon.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-04-18/the-dollar-is-not-losing-its-status-any-time-soon?leadSource=uverify%20wall&sref=loFkkPMQ

           

    Fundamental

 

       Headlines

 

              The Economy

 

                        US

 

  Weekly mortgage applications declined 8.8% while purchase applications were down 10.0%.

 

Month to date retail chain store sales grew more slowly than in the prior week.

 

                        International

 

February Japanese industrial production grew 4.6% versus estimates of +4.5%.

 

February EU YoY construction output was up 2.3% versus predictions of -2.0%; March CPI was +0.9%, in line.

 

March UK CPI was up 0.8% versus consensus of +0.5%; core CPI was +0.9% versus +0.6%.

 

                        Other

 

                          Arthur Okun’s Misery Index.

                          https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2023/04/misery-index.html

 

The ECB’s Lagarde on the global economy (surprisingly enough, a must read).

                          https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/en-lagarde-ecb-president-reveals-what-happens-next

 

            Recession

 

              A more upbeat view of a recession.

              https://stayathomemacro.substack.com/p/scary-economists-and-bad-news

           

            The Debt Ceiling

 

As I am sure that you are aware, the US debt will bump up against its legislated ceiling sometime in the next couple of months.  Historically, this has been more of a media event than an economic one in which both political parties posture, strut and jive and talk trash, then come to some sort of compromise.  I think the odds of a similar occurrence this time around are quite high.  But you can never overestimate the capacity of the ruling class to screw the American people/economy over a problem that they created and continue to endorse, jointly and severally.  So this issue will be increasingly in the headlines going forward.  Here is an initial analysis of the issue:

https://www.capitalspectator.com/how-much-us-debt-ceiling-risk-is-lurking/

 

            The Banking System

 

              A more upbeat view of the ‘credit crunch’.

              https://alhambrapartners.com/2023/04/17/weekly-market-pulse-much-ado-about-not-much-2/

 

But some cognitive dissonance: Brookfield defaults on $161 million loan on DC office buildings.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/dominos-falling-brookfield-defaults-161-debt-dc-office-buildings

 

In an article penned by Howard Marks (it is too long and covers too many irrelevant subjects to link to the whole thing), he makes a point about the inefficacy of moral hazard being applied to banks (e.g., Silicon Valley Bank).  I have been an advocate of the concept (i.e., let the bank go belly up); but I think that he makes a very good point and is perhaps right:

 

Moral Hazard

One problem with government solutions of any kind – like the so-called “Greenspan put” – is the possibility that they’ll generate moral hazard. That is, players will conclude that they’ll be rescued if they make a mistake. This suggests they can freely engage in high-risk, high-return behavior; if it works, they’ll get rich, but if it fails, they’ll be bailed out. People sometimes refer to this as “privatizing profits and socializing losses.”

On March 9, when SVB was hanging by a thread while experiencing massive withdrawals, people started talking about a possible government guarantee of all deposits. One of the arguments against such a bailout was that it would create moral hazard. If people know they’ll be protected from losses, they’ll have no reason to examine the solidity of a bank before depositing money, meaning the diligence function won’t be performed. Consequently, poorly run, poorly capitalized banks will be permitted to stay in business and grow.

But we simply cannot expect depositors to perform that function. Since banks’ operations are characterized by mismatched assets/liabilities and a dependence on depositors’ trust, it’s terribly hard to assess their financial health from the outside (maybe sometimes from the inside, too, since SVB succumbed to what in retrospect seem to have been obvious managerial mistakes). In the 28 years that Oaktree has been in business, we’ve invested in relatively few deposit-taking financial institutions. Other than in cases where we’ve become insiders, we’ve generally avoided investing in banks because their complex, often impenetrable financial disclosures and reliance on trust make them harder to evaluate than we would like.

Few people are capable of studying banks’ financial statements and determining whether they’ll remain solvent and liquid. Expecting depositors to do so could cause banking to grind to a halt. That’s why deposit insurance was introduced during the Great Depression. For the same reason, the government’s decision to fully guarantee SVB’s deposits was quite appropriate.

Notably, however, management and shareholders weren’t bailed out; rather, in today’s parlance, they were “bailed in,” or left with their losses. We can hope their losses will encourage other investors and bank managers to apply greater prudence in their future decision-making.

    Bottom line

 

            The five most expensive stocks to avoid now.

            https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1150030/the-5-most-expensive-stocks-to-avoid-now

 

Bloomberg model suggests that the economy has bottomed out and so to perhaps stocks.

            https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-16/case-for-stocks-is-seen-in-model-showing-economic-bottom-is-past?sref=loFkkPMQ

 

            Counterpoint.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-pause-wouldnt-necessarily-refresh-stock-market-29bf83c5?mod=hp_lead_pos3&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=2&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_elz9S3PIkUUChmnr-ENCd5kXeYUqo8TA2s2wJJjalI7zZyc59kz0bNkykf9BxewpaiXDUgDwh160aHsHCkEx9VGX9cw&utm_content=2&utm_source=hs_email

 

                        This will not be a normal recession.

            https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/will-not-be-normal-recession

 

BofA fund manager survey shows investor most bearish since 2009 (contrary indicator?).

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-18/investors-turn-most-underweight-stocks-versus-bonds-since-2009?srnd=premium&leadSource=uverify%20wall&sref=loFkkPMQ

 

            Four questions an investor must ask.

            https://behaviouralinvestment.com/2023/04/18/the-four-questions-investors-must-ask/

 

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

 

                  

What I am reading today

 

           

 

 

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment