Friday, March 8, 2019

The Morning Call--Watch the S&P 200 DMA


The Morning Call

3/8/19

The Market
         
    Technical

The Averages (DJIA 25473, S&P 2748) had their first rough day in a while.  The S&P has clearly backed off 2800, trading through a minor support level and ending right on its 200 DMA.  Meanwhile, the Dow’s 100 DMA has crossed below its 200 DMA---a technical negative.  So, it appears that follow through has been to the downside.  However, the 200 DMA usually presents decent support/resistance; hence, I will be watching how the S&P treats this level today as an indicator of near term price movement.

Volume was up; breadth was again weak.

The VIX was up 5 ½ %, ending above its prior low, having created a double bottom (bad for stocks).  Further, it closed right on its 200 DMA, being almost in inverse unison with the S&P.

The long bond was up ½ %, remaining above the support level at which it has now become a double bottom.   That leaves it in a trading range bounded by the aforementioned support level and its recent (triple) top.   Its 100 DMA has crossed above its 200 DMA, a positive.  Are the bond guys having second thoughts about higher rates/stronger economy?

The dollar soared, finishing above the upper boundary of the November to present trading range.  However, it gapped opened and as I remind you occasionally, those gaps are usually closed.  Other than that, this chart looks strong and suggests that investors believe that the US economy will be stronger than the rest of the world.

GLD was down slightly, closing above a second minor support level and above both MA’s.

Bottom line: the S&P has now clearly faded 2800.  That is negative short term; for things to get worse, it has to successfully challenge its MA’s.  It is way too soon to assume that yesterday’s pin action is anything other than a normal retreat off a very overbought condition.

            The price action in TLT, UUP and GLD remains inconsistent.

            Thursday in the charts.

            ***overnight, Chinese stocks plummet.

    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s data was mixed: weekly jobless claims were down less than anticipated, Q4 productivity was better than expected but unit labor costs were worse, January consumer credit rose more than consensus.

                Overseas, the Q4 EU GDP grew 0.2%, in line.

                The major headline was Draghi/ECB’s monetary policy easing---leaving interest rates unchanged, its current version of QE intact and promising to initiate additional QE steps later this year.  Given Draghi’s historic dovishness plus the fact that the Fed, the BOJ and the Bank of China have all become more expansive, this outcome is not surprising.  I continue to believe that the liquidity injections from the central banks will have little economic effect but will provide fuel for asset price advances.

                China trade remains a center stage:

(1)   China uneasy about trade deal.
                             https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-07/china-growing-uneasy-about-trade-talks-nyt
           
(2)   Trump wants both a trade deal and stock rally.  Can he get both?

(3)   Another not so positive take on Trump’s trade policies.
           
            ***overnight, trade summit delayed.

            Bottom line: all the trade happy talk notwithstanding, its outcome is not clear at all.  Whatever Trump may think about the value of any trade deal to investors, I believe that one that doesn’t properly address China’s industrial policy and IP will do nothing for the secular growth rate of the economy and could very well disappoint those investors that he is so eager to please.

            Central banks are now in QE sync.  The mispricing and misallocation of assets will only get worse.

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
           

Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US

            January consumer credit grew by $17.0 billion versus expectations of up $16.8 billion.

Credit card delinquencies rising.

                February nonfarm payrolls advanced 20,000 versus projections of up 175,000.

            January housing starts were up 18.6% versus consensus of up 8.5%; building permits rose 1.4% versus forecasts of down 2.9%.

     International

            The February Chinese trade surplus came in at $4.12 billion versus estimates of $17.5 billion.

                January Japanese household spending rose 0.7% versus expectations of -0.1%; Q4 GDP was up 0.5%, in line.

            February German manufacturing orders were down 2.6% versus projections of +0.5%; however, the January number was revised up substantially.
           
    Other

Household net worth declined in Q4.

The horror story of government spending (must read):

Are Trump’s deregulation efforts as positive as is being portrayed?

Italy’s battle with the EU back in the headlines.


What I am reading today
                               
                  How the Model T drove hats out of fashion.
                  https://lamaalrajih.com/2018/12/07/model-t-hats/

                  The moral implications of luck.

                  A look at confirmation bias.

                  The continuing resiliency of America.

                        Double your money.
                   
                  Investors should be satisfiers not maximizers.

                        What happens after you win.

                  ‘Artificial’ 2.1 earthquake detected in North Korea.

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




Thursday, March 7, 2019

The Morning Call--Four for Four


The Morning Call

3/7/19

The Market
         
    Technical

The Averages (DJIA 25673, S&P 2771) moved lower yesterday.  My focus continues to be the standoff at S&P 2800, with the S&P falling further from that level.  However, it remains above the first minor support level below 2800.  Until that gets successfully challenged, my assumption is that 2800 remains the line in the sand for bulls and bears.  Follow through.   But I add the that the Dow 100 DMA is crossing below its 200 DMA---a technical negative.

            And:

Volume declined; breadth was weak.

The VIX was up 5 ¾ %, ending above its prior low, having created a double bottom (bad for stocks).  However, it is still below both MA’s; and until it successfully challenges its 200 DMA, it points to an upward bias to equity prices.

The long bond was up 3/8 %, remaining above the support level that it challenged on Friday.  So, it is now in a trading range bounded by the aforementioned support level and its recent (triple) top.

The dollar was unchanged, finishing right on the upper boundary of the November to present trading range.  Its chart looks strong.

GLD was down slightly, closing above a second minor support level and above both MA’s.

Bottom line: the S&P continues to see saw across the 2800 resistance level.  While its inability to hold above 2800 is a negative, it has remains above the most minor support level.  So, yesterday’s pin action can’t really be characterized as negative. Directional follow through remains the most important factor for this chart.

            The price action in TLT, UUP and GLD was inconsistent and mirrors the recent return of minor uncertainty reflected in stock prices.

    Fundamental

       Headlines

Yesterday’s economic data was mixed: weekly mortgage and purchase applications declined and the December trade deficit was larger than anticipated.  The February ADP private payroll report was a bit confusing because the January reading was revised up substantially; it had the effect of making the February number look terrible viz a viz the revised January report (which the media focused on) but without giving credit for the major increase from December to January (which the media chose to ignore). 

            On the global front, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development lowered its 2019 growth forecast for the globe and the EU.

            The Fed released its latest Beige Book which read pretty much as expected: slight to moderate growth with the government shutdown having had a negative impact on economic activity (that is somewhat surprising to me); and a tight labor market.

                More:

                ***this morning, Draghi/ECB announced that it would leave rates unchanged, continue its version of QE and institute additional QE steps in September.  That makes it four for four central banks easing monetary policy.  I repeat that, in my opinion, this new round of QE will have the same results as other QE’s, i.e. none, but should keep stocks on an upward trajectory.

In yesterday’s Morning Call, I linked to report that Trump is rumored to be willing to make a China deal that doesn’t include reforms in China’s industrial policy and IP theft.  Several experts weighed in during the day.

            More:

Bottom line: the numbers continue their trend of poor reports from December and January will some improvement in February’s results. That said, the OECD forecast (above) is not that hopeful. On the other hand, the Fed Beige Book isn’t that negative.  And the current nowcasts (below) for the first quarter are mixed.  Confused?  Remember all of these reports are produced by a bunch economists looking at models which contain formulas that tie themselves in a granny knot. So, I don’t think any of these guys have a clue---just like me.   So at present, I have no reason to change my forecast; and until it is clear that investors actually care one way or the other, I am not sure why the dataflow will have much impact.

A bit more important is the results of US/China trade negotiations.  After weeks of happy talk, doubts are growing on the shape of any agreement, especially regarding China’s industrial and IP theft policies.  I have no insight as to the outcome nor how investors will react.  My opinion remains that (1) any agreement will likely be a short term cyclical but (2) if it doesn’t deal effectively with those Chinese policies, it will be a secular negative and it will likely devalue Trump’s negotiating skills which will have effect on the behavior of any opponent in any future deal whether economic or political.

Most important is central bank (QE) policies.  As long as they are rushing to throw money at the Markets to avoid a hissy fit, the Markets will likely continue to have an upward price bias---until, as and if, they figure out that QE’s are doing nothing for the global economies but are seriously distorting the pricing of risk.

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
            General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) declares $1.02/share quarterly dividend, 9.7% increase from prior dividend of $0.93.

Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US

            Weekly jobless claims fell 3,000 versus estimates of a 5,000 decline.

            Q4 productivity grew 1.9% versus forecasts of up 1.6%; unit labor costs rose 2.0% versus consensus of +1.8%.

     International
               
                Q4 EU GDP grew 0.2%, in line.

    Other

            New home sale prices rolling over.

            Trucking boom U turn.

            Stockman on the (defense) budget.

What I am reading today

            How it looks when a spacecraft shoots an asteroid.

                        What happens to your debt when you die?

Investment policy is in your hands.

            Thursday morning humor---click on the second video.

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




Wednesday, March 6, 2019

The Morning Call--Will Trump make a deal that doesn't include changes in China's industrial and IP theft policies?


The Morning Call

3/6/19

The Market
         
    Technical

The Averages (DJIA 25806, S&P 2789) had relatively quiet day.  Perhaps the most important technical factor impacting stocks right now is the standoff at S&P 2800, with the S&P remaining (slightly) below that level.   It clearly remains the line in the sand for bulls and bears.  Follow through.

Volume declined; breadth was weak.

The VIX was up fractionally, ending above its prior low. It has now set a double bottom (bad for stocks) but is still below both MA’s (good for stocks).

The long bond was up ¼ %, remaining above the support level that it challenged on Friday.  However, it still appears to have made a triple top.

The dollar rose, finishing right on the upper boundary of the November to present trading range.  Its chart looks strong.

GLD was up slightly, bouncing off a second minor support level and above both MA’s.

Bottom line: the S&P continues to see saw across the 2800 resistance level.  While its inability to hold above 2800 is a negative, the lack of follow through to the downside is a plus.  Directional follow through remains the most important factor for this chart.

            The pin action in TLT, UUP and GLD was inconsistent.

Tuesday in the charts.

    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s data was mixed: month to date retail chain store sales, the February Markit services PMI and the January/YTD budget deficit were negative while the February ISM nonmanufacturing index and December new home sales were a plus.
            However, the international stats were surprisingly upbeat for a change: the February EU composite and services PMI’s were stronger than anticipated as was the February UK services PMI.

            Bottom line: it was a slow day save for the numbers, so I repeat yesterday’s bottom line: as long as the economic data doesn’t fall off a cliff, the trade deal doesn’t explode in Trump’s face and the Fed stays easy, the Market bias should remain to the upside.
           
            ***overnight, Trump is rumored to be willing to make a China deal that doesn’t include reforms in China’s industrial policy and IP theft.  If so (operative phrase), the question is, what kind of deal has been priced into the Market?  If the answer is, any deal, then the question becomes, has that been fully priced in?  If the answer is, a deal that includes the aforementioned reforms, then the question becomes, how disappointed will the Market be?  I don’t presume to know the answer.

            February dividends by the numbers.

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF.B): Q3 GAAP EPS of $0.47 beats by $0.02.
Revenue of $904M (+3.0% Y/Y) misses by $6.71M.

Donaldson (NYSE:DCI): Q2 Non-GAAP EPS of $0.47 misses by $0.04; GAAP EPS of $0.46 misses by $0.05.
Revenue of $703.7M (+5.9% Y/Y) misses by $15.75M.


Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US

            Month to date retail chain store sales grew less rapidly than in the prior week.

            The February Markit services PMI came in at 56.0 versus expectations of 56.2.

            The ISM nonmanufacturing index was 59.7 versus estimates of 57.2.

            December new home sales rose 23,000 versus forecasts of a 53,000 decline.

The January budget surplus was $8.7 billion versus projections of $6.0 billion; however, the fiscal year to date deficit now stands at $310 billion up from $175 billion over the same time period last fiscal year.

Weekly mortgage applications declined 2.5% while purchase applications fell 3.0%.

The February ADP private payroll report showed an increase of 183,000 jobs versus expectations of a rise of 180,000; however, the January figure was revised from +231,000 to +300,000.

The December trade deficit came in at $59.8 billion versus estimates of $57.6 billion.

     International

            The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development lowered its 2019 global growth forecast from 3.5% to 3.3% and EU growth from1.8% to 1.0%.

    Other

            US/China spot rates on shipping containers near a low.

            The consumer now facing rising debt and interest rates.

            As you know, one of the major economic risks that I list in each week’s Closing Bell is a vulnerable global banking system wrought primarily by free money given to them by the central banks plus their management’s greedy and unscrupulous behavior for which they have been exempt by the political classes of their native countries.  Here is another growing problem.

            Return of the debt limit and sequestration.
           
            Modern Monetary nonsense.

            What if all our problems are interconnected?

            How monetary policy has impacted the economy.

            Trump appears set to scrap preferential trade treatment of India.

What I am reading today
                   
            North Korea rebuilding a missile site.

            Does ‘just a bit more’ make a difference?

            Not caring is a unique and powerful skill.

            The alternative to QE.

            Bill to end the forever war in Afghanistan (thank God).

            In investing, there are no laws just tendencies.

            For the People Act.

           

Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.



Tuesday, March 5, 2019

The Morning Call--S&P 2800 is still a problem


The Morning Call

3/5/19

The Market
         
    Technical

The Averages (DJIA 25819, S&P 2792) had another volatile day, this time closing down big.  Importantly, the S&P again failed to hold above the critical 2800 level.   It clearly remains the line in the sand for bulls and bears.  Follow through.

Volume declined; breadth was weak.

The VIX was up 8%, bouncing off its prior low (bad for stocks) but remaining below both MA’s (good for stocks)---though intraday, it challenged its 200 DMA but failed.

The long bond was up ¾ % on decent volume, finishing back above the support level that it challenged on Friday.  However, it still appears to have made a triple top.

The dollar rose, ending back above its prior lower high.  While it remains in that November to present trading range, its chart looks strong..

GLD was down another ¼ %, closing below a minor support level and below the lower boundary of its very short term uptrend for a second day, voiding that trend.

Bottom line: the S&P continues to see saw across the 2800 resistance level.  While its inability to hold above 2800 is a negative, the lack of follow through to the downside is a plus.  Directional follow through remains the most important factor for this chart.

          The pin action in TLT, UUP and GLD was inconsistent.

            Monday in the charts.

    Fundamental

       Headlines

Yesterday’s data was negative both here---December construction spending and February light vehicle sales were disappointing---and abroad---the January EU PPI was hotter than expected while February UK construction PMI fell into contraction.

            Two headlines:

(1)   another round of happy talk regarding the US/China trade talks.  I have beat this subject to death, so I won’t be repetitive, except to observe that there is a lot of good trade news priced into the Market,

***overnight, China lowered its estimate for 2019 economic growth to 6-6.5% from 6.5% in 2018.   In addition, it instituted $298 billion in tax cuts and said that it would target monetary policy to boost bank lending.

(2)   the house judiciary committee issues 81 document requests in a Trump obstruction of justice probe.  While this is likely nothing more than a [Willie] Clinton payback Easter egg hunt, it still has the potential to cause Market heartburn.


            Bottom line: the economic news is still negative; investors don’t seem to care.  I am not sure the trade news gets any better; but investors remain jiggy.  The Fed is now ‘patient’ rather than ‘data dependent’ giving it more flexibility to remain easy; investors love it.

            As long as these trends in investor behavior continue, the Market bias will likely stay positive.  That doesn’t mean stock prices won’t go down; it means that they probably won’t go down much and the S&P 2800 level is not the high.

Update on valuations.
           
            Beware the Ides of March.

            And if you really want to get depressed, here is the latest from John Hussman.

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
           

Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US

            December construction spending fell 0.6% versus expectations of +0.3%.

                February light vehicle sales were 16.5 million versus forecasts of 16.9 million.

     International

            The February EU services PMI came in at 52.8 versus projections of 52.3; the composite PMI was 51.9 versus 51.4.

            January EU retail sales rose 1.3% versus consensus of up 1.2%.

            The February UK services PMI was 51.3 versus an anticipated 49.9.

    Other

What I am reading today

            The earth is greener than it was 20 years ago.

            The opioid dilemma.

            A future for value investing.

            Ten rules for forecasting.
           
            How long are you willing to look stupid?


Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.