Friday, March 14, 2014

The Morning Call---The goldilocks scenario somewhere south of 100%

The Morning Call

3/14/14

Number two granddaughter is with us for a long weekend on her spring break, so no Closing Bell tomorrow.   Back on Monday.

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16108, S&P 1846) underwent some serious whackage yesterday.  Still, the S&P remained well within uptrends across all timeframes: short (1773-1950), intermediate (1732-2532) and long (739-1910).  The Dow finished within short (15330-16601) and intermediate (14696-16601) term trading ranges and a long term uptrend (5050-17400).  So they continue out of sync in their short and intermediate term trends---which leaves the Market trendless.

            Volume picked up a bit; but it remains anemic.  Breadth deteriorated.  The VIX was up 12% but it stayed within its short term trading range and intermediate term downtrend.

            And (short):

            The long Treasury was strong, largely I assume on the basis of a growing risk off sentiment due to the Chinese and Ukrainian situations.  It finished within a very short term trading range, a short term trading range and an intermediate term downtrend.

            GLD inched higher---not in harmony with the long bond risk off trade but likely digesting Wednesday’s strong advance.  It remains within a very short term uptrend but a short term downtrend (it closed right on the upper boundary of that trend) and an intermediate term downtrend.

Bottom line:  I thought it unusual that investors finally decided to get worried about China and Ukraine yesterday since they had some good economic news about which to be encouraged.  That said, given the underlying upward price momentum, one bad day is not enough to change my opinion that the Averages are likely to challenge the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends---the whole mentality of ‘buy the dips’ has likely not been dispelled by a little bad news and a tough day or two in the Market.  True the Dow has to get back in sync with the S&P but, at the moment, that seems like an annoying detail rather than a major obstacle.

So technically speaking, the odds still favor movement to the upside; although my intent is to use any price strength (1) that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly or (2) as a gift allowing us to eliminate a stock that fails to meet its quality criteria.

    Fundamental

     Headlines

            Yesterday’s US economic news was mostly upbeat: jobless claims fell versus expectations for a rise, February retail sales were better than expected and January business inventories grew---though the bad news was that sales declined.  This keeps the economic news flow for the week in ‘mixed’ territory---which as you know, is an improvement over what  we were getting a couple of weeks ago.  That keeps our forecast on track which I rate as a positive.

            Overseas the stats weren’t so good: Chinese industrial production and retail sales were noticeably below consensus which comes on the heels of the poor trade numbers.  As you know, investors are worried about two different but related problems---an economic slowdown and a credit crisis. The above data clearly addresses the former but the growing risks of bankruptcy and/or a severe reduction in lending could prompt a much faster decline in economic activity than many expect.
    
            Faber on China (6 minute video):

            And:

            The other economic development was the strength in the yen which is causing heartburn amongst the carry trade.  Coupled with the much more stringent monetary policy in China which is also a negative for the carry trade, the risks are rising for severe financial/liquidity strains in the hedge fund/proprietary trade community.

            Finally, tensions continue to rise in Ukraine.  The referendum in Crimea occurs this Sunday.  The foregone conclusion is that it will secede from Ukraine and join the Russian Federation.  The question is what are the other players (US, EU, UN) going to do about it and what will be Putin’s response.  As you know, I worry about Obama attempting to prove He is a hard guy (and/or rescue His plummeting poll ratings) and doing something stupid.  I guess that we will know early next week.

            Latest on Ukraine:

                And in action overnight:

                Finally, the official Russian line on this conflict as presented in an editorial in the Moscow Times (medium and a must read):


Bottom line: the risks to our Markets haven’t changed: the Chinese financial system, the Japanese economy, the US economy, the EU economy, Fed tapering and the political instability in Ukraine.  I am assuming that investors finally awoke to the fact that the odds of a goldilocks scenario are somewhere south of 100%.  That doesn’t mean that they didn’t take a Vicodin last night and will return all bulled up today. 

However, whatever their mindset is or will be going into the weekend, it doesn’t change by one iota the fact that equities are significantly overvalued on a relatively positive economic scenario.  So nothing could happen and the risk to the downside (20-30%) would still be there waiting for some other event to slap investors up the side of the head.  In other words, why would I want to buy stocks in that environment?

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.

            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.
                




Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment