Friday, March 7, 2014

The Morning Call--China re-introduces 'moral hazard'

The Morning Call

3/7/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16422, S&P 1877) drifted higher yesterday, continuing to consolidate from an overbought condition.  The S&P closed above the upper boundary of its short term trading range/all time high (1746-1848) for the third day of our time and distance discipline.  It remained within its intermediate term uptrend (1725-2505) and above its 50 day moving average.

            The Dow finished within its short term (15330-16601) and intermediate term (14696-16601) trading ranges and above its 50 day moving average.  Both of the Averages are within long term uptrends (5050-17400, 736-1910).

            Volume was flat at a depressed level; breadth was mixed.  The VIX rose fractionally, ending within its short term trading range and intermediate term downtrend and right on its 50 day moving average.

            The long Treasury took it in the snoot, though it remained within a short term trading range and an intermediate term downtrend and above its 50 day moving average. However, it also broke below a developing very short term uptrend; and that follows its bounce off the upper boundary of its short term trading range---perhaps a precursor to improving economic activity/higher interest rates/higher inflation?  That, of course, is a giant step from a couple of bad price days; so at the moment, this is just something to watch.

            GLD continued its almost uninterrupted upward path, closing within a very short term uptrend, short and intermediate term downtrends and above its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line:  the S&P inched its way up for the third day (time) and ever closer to the distance objective (1885).  At the moment, every indication is that the S&P’s short term trend will be re-set to the upside.  However, the upward momentum is being restrained by the lack of confirmation from the Dow, the transports and our internal indicator.   So more work needs to be done to re-set the entire Market to up. 

However, even if that happens, there is formidable resistance at the upper boundaries of the Averages long term uptrends (17400/1910) which really doesn’t leave a lot of potential ‘reward’ unless you are willing to bet that an 85 year trend is about to be broken.

That doesn’t mean that it won’t be breached or that prices won’t stick to the upper boundary and progress at the same rate.  It does mean that the risk/reward offered by stocks at such lofty prices isn’t that great; and given the proximity of current prices to those more generous valuations, I think it dangerous to try to trade the interval.   However, if I wanted to play with fire, I would do with a single well traded ETF that could be sold easily with little trading friction (VTI, IWO).

Meanwhile, there is really not much to do save using any price strength that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly.

            A different look at market history (short):

            Household equity allocations near all-time highs (short):

            Update on sentiment (short):

    Fundamental
    
      Headlines

            The US economic stats were mixed again yesterday: weekly jobless claims and February retail chain store sales were better than expected while fourth quarter productivity and unit labor costs were disappointing as were January factory orders.  While not the ideal data flow, mixed is still better than we have gotten over the last month; so I remain encouraged by the improvement.

            There was a lot going on overseas:

(1)   the ECB left interest rates unchanged though it signaled that monetary policy would get more accommodative.  Given that it has been the most austere of the large global central banks, an easier ECB is not necessarily a negative,

(2)   Ukraine isn’t going away as a ‘hot spot’.  The Crimean parliament voted to secede from Ukraine and re-join Russia.  That is not making a lot of folks in Washington happy but I am sure Vladimir has a smile on his face.  What will keep this situation on the front burner of risk is our own ruling class getting its collective panties in a wad and doing something stupid to provoke the Russians.  Clearly, investors have ceased worrying about it; but I never underestimate our politicians’ ability to make a bad situation worse.


(3)   today is ‘D’ day for the bankruptcy of that Chinese solar company.  How the government handles this situation could potentially have a major impact on the Markets.  That said, the world knows this bankruptcy is coming, so it should be in the price of stocks.

***overnight, the company failed to make its interest payment.  So the game is on.

Bottom line: while the economic news flow has turned from outright positive early in the week to mixed presently, it is still an improvement over recent data and therefore encouraging.  However, as you know, the US economy has never been a risk in our forecast.  So any news confirming that outlook is basically no news.  The issues are, assuming the economy remains on track and, therefore, the Fed’s tapering remains on track, how will investors react? and (2) stock valuations are excessive even under our ‘good news’ scenario. 

Of course, overvalued equities tend to stay that way or become even more overvalued until acted upon by an outside force.  To date, there have been no such outside forces sufficient to cause enough cognitive dissonance to alter psychology, especially in a free money world.

Clearly, if I know this, then why not (to coin a now infamous phrase) ‘keep dancing until the music stops’?  And the answer is, go ask the guy who said that (Chuck Prince) how it worked out for him (hint---not good).  The other answer is that I am not that smart.  There is only going to be the opportunity for a few to exit before the carnage starts and most of them will be likely just be lucky.  So I would rather preserve principal, forego the last leg of an uptrend in the knowledge that I have plenty of cash to buy stocks cheap from the geniuses that are still dancing.

In the meantime, there are a couple of potential attention getting outside forces at work: (1) the geopolitics of Ukraine is not likely settled; and (2) the Chinese government is apparently about to do something no central bank has done since 2009, i.e. inject moral hazard into the investment process.  How that plays out I haven’t a clue; but it could impact the calculation of security valuation going forward.  We can only watch events unfold.

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.

            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.

            Update on valuation (medium):






Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment