Tuesday, July 16, 2013

The Morning Call---At the moment, technicals rule

The Morning Call

7/16/13

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 15454, S&P 1682) inched higher yesterday.  They remain within their short term trading ranges (14190-15550, 1576-1687) and the intermediate term (14362-19362, 1524-2112) and long term uptrends (4918-17000, 715-1800).

            Clearly, the Averages are near challenging the upper boundaries of the short term trading ranges/May highs.  I have suggested that a penetration of these levels would likely lead to another leg up; an unsuccessful test would create a double (triple) top.   However, the longer stocks fiddle around, consolidating an overbought position right under the 15550/1687 levels, the more likely it is that the next big move will be to the upside.

            On the other hand, a check with our internal indicator provides the following reading: in a Universe of 141 stocks, 84 are still some distance from making new highs, 41 have made new highs and 16 are on the cusp.  That does not suggest that a break to the upside is imminent.  However, the longer stocks continue to trade at current levels, the more likely it becomes that this indicator shifts to a more positive position.

            Volume fell; breadth was mildly to the plus side.  The VIX confirmed its Friday break of a very short term uptrend, re-setting the short term trend to a trading range.  It remains within its intermediate term downtrend.

            GLD was up fractionally; so there was no improvement to its technically broken chart.

Bottom line: if equities are successful at overcoming the 15550/1687 level, resistance will be marked by the upper boundaries of their major trends (short term---1750, intermediate term---2109, long term ---1800). 

Assuming the 1750/1800 (short and long term upper boundaries) area represents the zone of maximum upside, that is about 3-6% versus 6% downside if stocks return to the short term lower boundary, 9% if they slide to the intermediate term lower boundary, 18% if they return to Fair Value and 57% if they make it all the way to the long term lower boundary

If the 15550/1687 levels hold, the risk exists that a double, even a triple, top will have been put in.

There is nothing to do but watch the process.

            Second half stats (short):

            Why Bernanke reversed himself (short and a must read):

    Fundamental
    
      Headlines

            We got mixed economic news both here and abroad yesterday.  

(1)                             in the US, June retail sales (both the headline and ex autos numbers) were disappointing while the New York Fed manufacturing index was above expectations.   These figures do little to alter our outlook for below average economic growth.

(2)                             internationally, China reported a lower second quarter GDP growth rate [7.5%], though it was expected; while industrial production was below estimates and retail sales were above forecasts.  Chinese economic activity has had and will have some impact on our own growth prospects.  However, as I have noted many times, US businesses have done a marvelous job of adapting to adverse conditions---in this case, insulating the US economy from the recent slowdown in China.  So at the moment, I don’t see further sluggish [for China] growth as a threat to our recovery---although a drop to a low to mid single digit rate could be a bit more worrisome.

Bernanke maintains the spot light with his Humphrey Hawkins testimony before congress due this week.  After the brouhaha of the last month, I can’t imagine him saying anything controversial or at odds with his last Casper Milquetoast presentation.  But until it is over, investors may want to stay cautious.

          Bottom line:  stocks are near their highs.  The next event critical for Market direction is technical as opposed to fundamental, to wit, will stocks move to new highs or remain in a short term trading range?  I say that because, at least as calculated by our Valuation Model, equities are sufficiently overvalued that fundamentally nothing short of a repeal of Obamacare, entitlement/tax reform and a move by the ECB to properly deal with southern Europe’s sovereign/bank debt problems could move Fair Values to current price levels.

          However, even if I ignore Fair Value and just try to price stocks off the technicals, I really don’t see much attractive about the risk/reward equation.  See analysis above in Technical section.        

          So if any of our stocks trade into their Sell Half Ranges, our Portfolios will act accordingly.

The latest from John Hussman (medium):




Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at

No comments:

Post a Comment