Tuesday, July 9, 2013

The Morning Call--Looks like I was wrong on 'tapering'

The Morning Call

7/9/13

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 15224, S&P 1640) pushed higher yesterday.  The Dow closed right on the downtrend off its May 22 high, while the S&P finished above it.  A higher close today will negate this very short term downtrend and set the short term trend to a trading range (1576-1687).

            Both of the Averages remain well within their intermediate term (14295-19295, 1517-2105) and long term uptrends (4783-17500, 688-1750).

            Volume rose; breadth was mixed.  The VIX fell fractionally and continues to struggle to re-set its short term trend to a trading range.

            GLD rose but remains in a steep decline and outside the boundaries of all major trends.

Bottom line: bulls appear to be re-gaining the upper hand, having taken stocks up thru their 50 day moving averages and are knocking on the door of negating the downtrend off the May 22 high.  Most of the stocks in our Universe remain in short term downtrends, though fewer than our last check.  Nevertheless, another strong day or two could change all that. 

Any additional move to the upside that takes any of our stocks into their Sell Half Ranges will be a further opportunity to do just that.

            A look at the worst six months of the year (short):


    Fundamental
    
      Headlines

            No US economic news yesterday, though investors seemed to be basking in the glow of Friday jobs report.  That gave the Market a positive bias at the opening and it lasted all day despite some lousy data (industrial production and net exports) out of Germany.

            Not surprising to me, the chatter among the pundits reveals a growing acceptance of ‘tapering’; but what does surprise me is that aren’t concerned about it.  Their attention has shifted from ‘QEInfinity’ to ‘an improving economy’ as a driving force in stock prices---suggesting that they have quickly overcome their concerns about higher interest rates and are seemingly unworried about the lack of evidence that the rate of economic growth is improving, the declining expectations for earnings growth (see yesterday’s Morning Call) and continued credit problems in China and Europe (see below).

            In other words, it seems that as long as the carry trade works, investors will find a reason to buy stocks, however illogical the transition in the reasoning process

Bottom line: I opined in the last note that (1) whether or not the Fed could convince investors to again drink the QE/the Fed has your back Kool Aid would likely to determine Market direction, at least in the near term and (2) I was skeptic. 

Well, it appears that investors have concluded that ‘tapering’ is now good news because it means the economy is improving (sort of).  While I have long argued that the economy was growing albeit at a sluggish pace, I have yet to see any evidence that its rate of growth is suddenly improving.  If that growth rate were changing positively, then it would give reason for better valuations.  But as I said, it is not. 

Indeed, the positive argument for stocks is not that the economy is improving but seems to be that our economy is the ‘nicest house on an ugly street’; hence, buy US stocks.  My problem with that case is that our economy doesn’t exist in a vacuum. 

To be sure, US managers have done a stellar job in running their business; I have noted endlessly that given our own headwinds (too much government spending, too high taxes, too much regulation), we can thank them for economic progress that has been made. 

However, Europe is in recession, China is teetering on the brink of a credit crunch, Japan is a basket case and emerging markets are slowing.  How then does our economy pick up steam when (1) nothing has been done to lessen the impact of the aforementioned domestic constraints and (2) the rest of the globe is growing very slowly at best?  You see my confusion.

***over night, the White House lowered its 2013 GDP growth expectations to 2.0% from 2.3%, China reported rising inflation and the Portuguese opposition party is calling for elections.

So my conclusion hasn’t changed:  I simply can’t get the assumptions plugged into our Models positive enough to justify current valuations.  So I remain cautious and our Portfolios will continue to take advantage of any upward price movement that drives any of our stocks into their Sell Half Ranges.

            The latest from John Hussman (medium):

            A bond market indicator turns negative (short):
            http://rp-pix.com/oz

            And, are interest rates about to blast off? (medium):

            Nearing a peak in the election cycle (short):

      Investing for Survival

            25 steps to prepare for an emergency:




Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at

No comments:

Post a Comment