Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Investing for Survival

 Investing for Survival---20 insights from Peter Lynch (1-5)

1. Invest In What You Know
This is where it helps to have identified your personal investor’s edge.  What is it that you know a lot about?  Maybe your edge comes from your profession or a hobby.  Maybe it comes just from being a parent.  An entire generation of Americans grew up on Gerber’s baby food, and Gerber’s stock was a 100-bagger.  If you put your money where your baby’s mouth was, you turned $10,000 into $1 million.
2. Let Your Winners Run
It’s easy to make a mistake and do the opposite, pulling out the flowers and watering the weeds.  If you’re lucky enough to have one golden egg in your portfolio, it may not matter if you have a couple of rotten ones in there with it.  Let’s say you have a portfolio of six stocks.  Two of them are average, two of them are below average, and one is a real loser.  But you also have one stellar performer.  Your Coca-Cola, your Gillette.  A stock that reminds you why you invested in the first place.  In other words, you don’t have to be right all the time to do well in stocks.  If you find one great growth company and own it long enough to let the profits run, the gains should more than offset mediocre results from other stocks in your portfolio.
3. On Growth Stocks
There are two ways investors can fake themselves out of the big returns that come from great growth companies.  The first is waiting to buy the stock when it looks cheap.  Throughout its 27-year rise from a split-adjusted 1.6 cents to $23, Walmart never looked cheap compared with the overall market.  Its price-to-earnings ratio rarely dropped below 20, but Walmart’s earnings were growing at 25 to 30 percent a year.  A key point to remember is that a p/e of 20 is not too much to pay for a company that’s growing at 25 percent.  Any business that an manage to keep up a 20 to 25 percent growth rate for 20 years will reward shareholders with a massive return even if the stock market overall is lower after 20 years.
The second mistake is underestimating how long a great growth company can keep up the pace.  In the 1970s I got interested in McDonald’s.  A chorus of colleagues said golden arches were everywhere and McDonald’s had seen its best days.  I checked for myself and found that even in California, where McDonald’s originated, there were fewer McDonald’s outlets than there were branches of the Bank of America.  McDonald’s has been a 50-bagger since.
4. Career risk is more highly regarded than market risk
In fact, between the chance of making an unusually large profit on an unknown company and the assurance of losing only a small amount on an established company, the normal mutual-fund manager, pension-fund manager, or corporate-portfolio manager would jump at the latter. Success is one thing, but it’s more important not to look bad if you fail. There’s an unwritten rule on Wall Street: “You’ll never lose your job losing your client’s money in IBM.”
5. Stocks are most likely to be accepted as prudent at the moment they’re not.
For two decades after the Crash, stocks were regarded as gambling by a majority of the population, and this impression wasn’t fully revised until the late 1960s when stocks once again were embraced as investments, but in an overvalued market that made most stocks very risky. Historically, stocks are embraced as investments or dismissed as gambles in routine and circular fashion, and usually at the wrong times.


Morning Journal---GDP versus total credit outstanding

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
·                                 General Mills (GIS): FQ2 EPS of $0.83 misses by $0.05.
·                                 Revenue of $4.88B misses by $0.07B.
 
Economics

   This Week’s Data

            The International Council of Shopping Centers reported weekly sales of major retailers up 4.8% versus the prior week and up 2.0% versus the comparable period a year ago; Redbook Research reported month to date retail chain store sales up 2.9% on a year over year basis.

            October’s budget deficit came in at $94.8 billion versus September’s $96.8 billion.

            Weekly mortgage applications fell 5.5% while purchase applications were off 6.0%.

            November housing starts rose 22% versus estimates of a 7% increase.
           
   Other

            GDP versus total credit outstanding (short):
           
Politics

  Domestic

  International

            The perils of North Korea’s Kim Jung Un (medium):


The Morning Call--Taper or not?

The Morning Call

12/18/13
The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 15875, S&P 1781) couldn’t muster any follow through from Monday’s big up day.  That means that both now have made two lower highs after selling off from the late November all time highs.  That doesn’t necessarily portend future negative pin action; but a very short term downtrend has now been established and we just need to watch it.

            Nonetheless, the Averages closed within uptrends along all major timeframes: short term (15554-20554, 1755-1909), intermediate term (15554-20554, 1657-2238) and long term (5050-17400, 728-1900)

            Volume was flat; breadth deteriorated.  The VIX rose but continues to meander within a short term trading range.  It is also in an intermediate term downtrend.

            The long Treasury was up but did nothing to challenge its short term trading range, its intermediate term downtrend or the construction of a head and shoulders formation.

            GLD fell and remains the sickest puppy on the block. It closed within its short and intermediate term downtrends.  The only positive is that it hasn’t broken below the lower boundary of its long term trading range.

Bottom line:  the lack of follow through in yesterday’s pin action was surprising to me; in that stocks through the preponderance of this up Market have tended bounce hard off of oversold conditions.  There is now a very short term downtrend in place and it should be respected until proven otherwise.

That said, I still think that there is a better than even chance of the indices challenging the 17400/1900 level---although I think that only the nimblest of traders should attempt to play the move.  For my part, I will continue to use any advance as an opportunity for our Portfolios to take advantage of our Sell Price Discipline.
 
            The technical significance of January (short):

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            The trend of better US economic news continued yesterday: CPI was flat, though ex food and energy, it was a bit higher than anticipated; weekly retail sales were good and the October budget deficit was once again smaller than expected.

            Overseas, German investor confidence hit a seven year high and the EU CPI was down month over month.

            So our economic forecast (slow, below average but steady growth) remains on track.  However, just to be clear, in my opinion, there is nothing in the numbers to suggest that growth is about to accelerate.

            I am not sure how much attention investors paid to these headlines, as the FOMC meeting and today’s release of its updated policy were center stage.  If you were watching the news channels, you know that there was an endless parade of pundits opining on what the Fed will or won’t do today. 

            We will know soon enough and then we will also know how Markets react.

Bottom line: speculating on what will happen this afternoon is a waste of both your and my time.  So I leave with the thought that whatever the Fed does, it won’t change the fact that stocks are considerably overvalued one iota---although it certainly could change the Markets’ perception of valuation.

It also doesn’t change my call:   I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            More on valuation (medium):

            And (short):

            Fear and loathing in muni land (medium and a must read if you own them):

            Bubble logic and Fed tapering (medium):

            More from Jim Grant (2 minute video):

            The latest from Marc Faber (8 minute video):
            


Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

HollyFrontier (HFC) 2013 Review

HollyFrontier Corp, which is the result of a merger of Holly Corp and Frontier Oil in July 2011, is one of the largest independent petroleum refiners in the US producing gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, asphalt and specialty lubricant products.  Consolidated historical figures are not yet available; however, earnings per share are expected to grow from $6.42 in 2011 to $6.75 in 2014 while the dividend per share should increase from $.33 to $1.40.  Return on equity in 2013 will be roughly 20%.  HFC should benefit from:

(1) economies of scale from its expanded infrastructure,

(2) margins are benefiting from heavy crude differentials as well as price differences between inland and coastal crude,

(3) stock buybacks.

            The major negative is lack of volume growth.

HFC is rated B++ by Value Line, has a 16% debt to equity ratio and its stock yields 2.4%.

Statistical Summary

                 Stock      Dividend         Payout      # Increases  
                Yield      Growth Rate     Ratio       Since 2011

HFC           2.5%          17%              20                  3
Ind Ave      4.9              6                  27                 NA 

                Debt/                        EPS Down       Net        Value Line
                Equity        ROE      Since 20011      Margin       Rating

HFC          16%           20%             11               7             B++
Ind Ave     20              15                NA              7            NA

    Chart

            Note: HFC stock made great progress off its November 2008 low, quickly surpassing the downtrend off its July 2007 high (red line) and its November 2008 trading high (green line).  Long term, the stock is in an uptrend (straight blue lines).  Intermediate term, it is in an uptrend (purple lines); although it has be struggling of late to remain within that trend.   The wiggly blue line is on balance volume.  The Aggressive Growth Portfolio owns a 75% position in HFC.  The upper boundary of its Buy Value Range is $25; the lower boundary of its Sell Half Range is $69.


   

12/13

The latest from Jim Grant

Morning Journal--Generational theft

News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
            Boeing raises dividend and announces buyback
·                                                                          
            FactSet EPS in-line, misses on revenues
FactSet (FDS): FQ1 EPS of $1.22 in-line.
Revenue of $223.0M (+6% Y/Y) misses by $0.66M.

Economics

   This Week’s Data

            November industrial production  rose 1.1% versus expectations of up 0.6%; capacity utilization came in at 79.0 versus estimates of 78.4.

            The December Markit US flash PMI was reported at 54.4 versus forecasts of 55.0.

            November CPI was flat, in line; ex food and energy, it rose 0.2% versus consensus of +0.1%.

   Other

            Update on big four economic indicators (medium):

            Measuring changes in income (short and a must read):

            The Fed’s 100th birthday is coming up; but should we be celebrating? (medium):

Politics

  Domestic

Generational theft (short):

  International

            Escalation in the China/Japan territorial dispute (medium):

The Morning Call--Sentiment swinging to no tapering

The Morning Call

12/17/13

The Market
           
    Technical
           
            The indices (DJIA 15884, S&P 1786) rallied strongly yesterday from an oversold position.  They closed within uptrends along all timeframes: short term (15542-20542, 1752-1906), intermediate term (15552-20542, 1657-2238) and long term (5050-17400, 728-1900).

            Volume rose slightly; breadth improved.  Surprisingly, the VIX rose on the big up day, suggesting that despite the positive pin action, investors were also buying Market protection.

            The long Treasury fell, remaining within a short term trading range and an intermediate term downtrend.  It continues to build a head and shoulders formation.

            GLD was up but finished within short and intermediate term downtrends.

Bottom line:  yesterday’s rebound was partly a function of the Market being oversold, partly a function of the Market’s positive seasonal bias and partly a change in investor psychology which seems to have shifted from fear of tapering to rejoicing at no tapering. 

17400/1900 remain my best guess at the potential upside from here.  Given that it is somewhat limited, I see no reasons to chase stocks from here and, in fact, I will continue to use the current advance as an opportunity for our Portfolios to take advantage of our Sell Price Discipline.
  
    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            Yesterday’s economic news was generally upbeat: third quarter nonfarm productivity was better than expected while November industrial production was almost double estimates; the December Markit flash PMI was just slightly below forecast.  The only real downer was the December NY Fed manufacturing index.  All in all, the data provided evidence that the economy remains in good shape and that there is little risk of an economic downturn.

            Overseas, the stats were mixed with the eurozone flash PMI coming in better than anticipated while the Chinese flash PMI was disappointing.

            The economic numbers particularly industrial production certainly provided a fundamental reason for stocks to rally.  This was aided by an apparent change in attitude regarding tapering, i.e. it won’t begin following this week’s FOMC meeting.  As you know, I never thought there was much chance of this happening; so it is not surprising to see sentiment swing in that direction.  When coupled with the seasonal bias, it is also not surprising that stocks would be rallying.

            However, I have issues with stocks going into the wild blue yonder: (1) I believe that the economy is fine, stocks are just valuing it richly.  At some point this disconnect will be rectified and (2) QE will have to end, sooner or later; given that monetary policy is in uncharted territory, there are risks of unintended consequences; we just don’t know the order of magnitude; the longer QE goes on, the greater the likely magnitude of those unintended consequences.  It may be that the Fed finesses the tapering and nothing bad occurs.  History says that won’t happen.  But until we know, caution has to be part of investment strategy

Bottom line: our Valuation Model depicts stocks as considerably overvalued even with an improving economy and ignoring any possible negative fallout from an unwinding in QE.  It is the latter factor that poses the real Market problem. 

Stocks can stay overvalued for lengths of time as long as the economic fundamentals are improving.  They adjust to Fair Value when some exogenous event occurs that gives the Market a reality check.  I think that it is very reasonable to assume that it will be the transition process from easy to tight money that provides that reality check---not because the transition itself is an exogenous event.  Clearly it is not.  But the preponderance of pundits either dismiss the probability of tapering as an event not likely to occur in our lifetime or assume that the genius’ in the Fed can manage the transition from easy to tight money in a way to effectively avoid any negative consequences---something that it has never done in its history.   Neither will likely occur and that is your exogenous event.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            The Markets are not ready for a rise in short term interest rates (medium):

            Three reasons for a global dividend growth strategy (short):

            The latest from John Hussman (medium):

       Investing for Survival

            2013 lessons learned (medium):




Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.