Friday, September 26, 2014

The Morning Call---Follow through or will the 'buy the dippers' show up?

The Morning Call

9/26/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            IN COMING!!  Unless you are Rip Van Winkle, you know that the indices (DJIA 16945, S&P 1965) suffered some serious whackage yesterday.  In the process, it clarified the confusion over the Dow’s back and forth around 17158 (upper boundary of its short and intermediate term trading range).  As confused as it makes me appear, I am once again switching my call on the DJIA’s short term trend---it’s now back at a trading range (16332-17158).  It remains within its intermediate term trading range (15132-17158) and long term uptrend (5148-18484).  It also finished right on its 50 day moving average.

The S&P remained in uptrends across all time frames: short term (1955-2146), intermediate term (1922-2722) and long term (771-20200; however, it closed below its 50 day moving average.

Volume was up; breadth poor.  The Market is in extremely oversold territory.  The VIX was up 18%, but still ended within short and intermediate term downtrends. It is back above its 50 day moving average.

Net free credit at dangerously low level (short and must read):

Update on sentiment (short):

The long Treasury spiked, finishing within short and intermediate term trading ranges and above its 50 day moving average.

GLD rose slightly but remained within very short term, short term and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.

Gold, the dollar and the Market (short):

Bottom line: although yesterday’s pin action left little doubt about investor sentiment, I don’t think that negates the recent overall pattern of schizophrenia.  After all, given the volatility of the last couple of days, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Averages rebounded 1-2% today.  Barring that, we did get a little clarity in the Dow trends---short term back to a trading range; intermediate term in a trading range. 

At this point, the big question is, will the ‘buy the dippers’ show up?   If they do, then direction will likely remain to the upside though the rate of change appears to have declined noticeably.  If not, well, then maybe we get some meaningful price adjustment.  However, that is getting way ahead of ourselves.  The job now is to await the arrival of the buyers or the magnitude of the initial follow through to the downside.

Our strategy remains to Sell stocks that are near or at their Sell Half Range or whose underlying company’s fundamentals have deteriorated.

The Market’s historical performance in October (short):

    Fundamental
    
       Headlines

            Talk about a rough day for news.  US economic data got us started on a sour note: August durable goods---disappointing; the September Markit services PMI---disappointing; the Kansas City Fed manufacturing index---disappointing; and the silver lining of the day, weekly jobless claims up just not as much as expected.  Clearly, these stats, especially the durable goods number, did nothing to lessen my concerns about a slowing global economy beginning to impact our own.

            After that, it was a downhill slide:

(1)   in a speech in Rome, the Dallas Fed chief made a very negative comment on the level of risk that now exists in high yield bonds,
           
(2)   then Russia delivered a one-two bunch,

[a] first it announced that in retaliation for the EU re-selling Russian gas to Ukraine, it was considering cutting off all gas to the EU.  Oh, darn.  (medium)

[b] then, it threatened freezing foreign assets is response to the Italians seizing a couple of villas of one of Putin’s buddies (short)

            ***overnight, German consumer confidence came in lower than anticipated; and Japanese CPI was less than expected, more evidence that QE isn’t working (it is supposed to increase inflation).

            I said last week that I thought that we would soon be looking at Ukraine in the rear view mirror.  Clearly, that was a bit premature.  Equally clear is that Putin is reminding all the players that there is a price to pay for fucking with Russia---however small the transgression.  Think of his response to the Italians confiscating his buddy’s house and our own response to Mexico which has held for over six months a US citizen who took a wrong turn and accidentally ended up there.  My point is that as long as the West keeps poking Putin in the eye, the risk of a negative geopolitical event remains.

Bottom line: the good news was… well, there was no good news.  The bad news was that our forecast got punched again with a lousy primary economic datapoint; in this case, August durable goods orders---which was followed by some equally disappointing secondary stats.  The question in my mind is why this weighed as heavily on investors’ minds especially after the very upbeat QEInfinity news from China and Japan on Wednesday? 

The answer that I would like have is that investors have finally figured this scam out.  QE does nothing for economic progress; it simply assists the mispricing of assets.  Maybe the Fisher speech was an emperor’s new clothes moment; but there have been so many prior more obvious moments, that it seems unlikely.  

As always, there is possibility that yesterday was just one of those random days when the Market internals worked to push prices lower.

However, I come back to a point that I have made several times: the investment environment has changed since the FOMC meeting.  QEInfinity is no longer being viewed as a plus by the gold, commodities, Treasuries and real estate (REIT’s) markets.  I postulate that it could be reflective of the gradual realization that the global economy is slowing irrespective of QE and that is bad news for the US expansion.  So far, the evidence fits.  But much more needs to occur before it can be confirmed.

As I said Tuesday, I don’t see how the US economy can continue to stand tall in the face of weakening global economic activity and unfriendly government monetary/fiscal/regulatory policy.  Sooner or later, I believe that some number, some incident is going to pop the balloon of overvaluation.  I am clueless as to which one it will be.  But the yellow light is flashing.

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.

            More on valuation (short):

            More on internal divergences (short):
            http://www.advisorperspectives.com/commentaries/gavekal_092514.php

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Becton Dickinson (BDX) 2014 Review

Becton Dickinson produces a wide range of medical devices as well as products for the collection and transport of diagnostic specimens, instruments for analysis and testing for infectious diseases and research and clinical tools for the study of cells.  The company has grown profits and dividends at a 12-17% annual pace over the last 10 years earning a 20%+ rate of return on equity.  The company should sustain its growth via:

(1) new product innovation and introduction,

(2) a newly instituted cost containment program,

(3) international expansion,

(4) acquisitions.

Negatives:

(1) high unemployment reduces the demand for medical care, in particular, testing,

(2) highly competitive industry,

(3) its international operations subject to risk of losses from currency fluctuations,

(4) rising raw material costs.

BDX is rated A++ by Value Line, has a debt to equity ratio of about 41% and its stock yields 1.9%.

  Statistical Summary

                Stock      Dividend         Payout      # Increases 
               Yield      Growth Rate     Ratio         Since 2004

BDX           1.9%          10               34%             10
Ind Ave       1.5             10*             26                NA

                Debt/                       EPS Down       Net        Value Line
               Equity         ROE      Since 2004      Margin       Rating

BDX         41%            22%            2                15%           A++
Ind Ave     25               15             NA               14              NA

*over one half of companies in BDX industry do not pay dividends

     Chart

            Note: BDX stock made good progress off its November 2008 low, surpassing the downtrend off its January 2008 high (straight red line) and the November 2008 trading high (green line).  Long term, the stock is in an uptrend (blue lines).  Intermediate term, it is in a trading range (purple lines).  The wiggly red line is the 50 day moving average.  The Aggressive Growth Portfolio owns a full position in BDX.  The upper boundary of its Buy Value Range is $101; the lower boundary of its Sell Half Range is $152.


   

9/14

Morning Journal---Thursday Morning Humor

   News on Stocks in Our Portfolios

o    Paychex (NASDAQ:PAYX): FQ1 EPS of $0.47 beats by $0.01.
o    Revenue of $666.8M (+8.8% Y/Y) beats by $4.18M.

Economics

   This Week’s Data

            August new home sales soared 18% versus expectations of 4% increase.

                And:

                August durable goods orders plunged 18.2% versus estimates of a 17.1% decline; ex transportation, they rose 0.7% versus forecasts of +0.8%.  You can see how the transportation (aircraft) orders distorted July and August numbers; so the -18.2% fall is not as bad as it looks.  Nonetheless, orders, both before and after transportation, were weaker than anticipated.

            Weekly jobless claims rose 12,000 versus expectations of an increase of 20,000.

   Other

Politics

  Domestic

  International War Against Radical Islam

            Thursday morning humor (short):


The Morning Call---The QEInfinity crowd gets a shot in the arm

The Morning Call

9/25/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            Yesterday, the indices (DJIA 17210, S&P 1998) made a nice recovery from an oversold position (though they remain oversold).  The Dow once again finished above 17158 (upper boundaries of short and intermediate term trading ranges).  That re-sets the short term trend from a trading range to an uptrend (16608-19000)---on the condition that the Dow doesn’t turn right back around today and close back below 17158.

Under our time and distance discipline, the clock re-starts on the intermediate term trading range.  If it trades above 17158 through the close on Friday, it will re-set to an uptrend.  For now, it is in an intermediate term trading range (15132-17158), a long term uptrend (5148-18484) and above its 50 day moving average.

            The S&P remained in uptrends across all time frames: short term (1955-2146), intermediate term (1922-2722) and long term (771-20200.

            Volume was flat; breadth improved.  The VIX fell 11%, finishing within short and intermediate term downtrends and back below its 50 day moving average.

            Update on NYSE margin debt (medium):

            The long Treasury declined, ending within short and intermediate term trading ranges but back below its 50 day moving average.

            More on the recent dollar strength (medium):

                GLD dropped, finishing within very short term, short term and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line: the Dow continued its schizophrenic behavior rallying hard and closing back above 17158---primarily on the rising prospects of QEInfinity/lower interest rates (see below).  That makes the short term trend up and the intermediate term trend a trading range---but once again subject to our time and distance discipline in its challenge to re-set to an uptrend. Meanwhile, the S&P continues up across all time frames. 

As if the DJIA pin action weren’t confusing enough, bonds and gold were off---suggesting higher interest rates on a day when the news events largely point to lower rates.  Plus as I have been noting for some time, the movement of the dollar is in the mix somewhere.  It was up yesterday.  That would explain the fall in gold prices; but of late a rising dollar has meant rising bond prices.  Go figure. 

However these cross currents get resolved, I think my most prescient thought to date is, that they likely illustrate how difficult any continued upward movement in stock prices will be.  Not that they won’t occur; but when they do, it won’t come as easily as it has to date.

Our strategy remains to Sell stocks that are near or at their Sell Half Range or whose underlying company’s fundamentals have deteriorated.
           
    Fundamental
 
       Headlines

            We finally got an upbeat primary datapoint yesterday: August new home sales soared 18%.  On the other hand, weekly mortgage and purchase applications fell.  Clearly the former was the more important stat.  Now we need a couple more just like it to take away the sting of the recent poor numbers.

            Overseas, the only economic datapoint was a poor September German business conditions index.  That reinforces my concern that weak global economic activity will sooner or later start to impact our own.

            That said, the real news of the day came from the global central bankers.  First, in an interview responding to a question about the lousy EU economy, Draghi gave his ‘any measure necessary’ (to improve the economy) response.  Forget that this comment is getting a little threadbare when in fact (1) he has done virtually nothing in the face of a deteriorating EU economy, (2) what he had done has had little to no impact and (3) the Germans continue to say ‘nein’ to the additional measures that he pretends that he wants to do. 

The rise of the German anti-euro party threatens QE (medium):

            Later, the QEInfinity trade got another shot in the arm when the Chinese premier made noises that he was replacing the head of the Bank of China---this being the guy (noted in last week’s Closing Bell) who recently told the world that what appeared to be an easing in monetary policy was a technical move and that the Bank of China was standing firm in its commitment to curb speculation in the Chinese real estate market.  In other words, monetary policy would remain tight.   Apparently, he apparently didn’t pass that memo through the government hierarchy because in his comments, the premier voiced concerns about insufficient Chinese economic growth.  In short, if the Bank of China guy is getting fired, it would seem that the Chinese are about to re-join the QEInfinity crowd (medium and a must read):

            Finally, we got a report from the Bank of Japan updating its own QE effort---a part of which is the further ramping up of equity purchases (medium):

Why all this matters (short and a must read):

Bottom line: the good news is that new home sales were robust and they hopefully will mark the end of a string of disappointing datapoints on key sectors of the economy---the operative word being ‘hopefully’.  The bad news is that our major trading partners continue driving to QEInfinity hoop despite their consistent inability to score a success.  Of course, the success that I am referring to is of the economic variety while unfortunately the success that they are achieving is of the asset pricing variety. 

The easy conclusion here is that stock prices just got a boost; and indeed, that may be the case.  However, the investment environment has changed since the FOMC meeting.  QEInfinity is no longer being viewed as a plus for gold, commodities, Treasuries and real estate (REIT’s).  That, of course, does not necessarily mean that stocks won’t continue their climb.  But even there, internal divergences are not only increasing, they are starting to get noticed by the media and their pundits. 

Again, that may not stop a further price advance.  But as I said yesterday, I don’t see how the US economy can continue to stand tall in the face of weakening global economic activity and unfriendly government monetary/fiscal/regulatory policy.  Sooner or later, I believe that some number, some incident is going to pop the balloon of overvaluation.  I am clueless as to which one it will be.  But the yellow light is flashing.

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.

            Anecdotal evidence of continued economic progress (medium):

       Investing for Survival

            Preserving capital in a bear market---from Pragmatic Capitalist

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Investing for Survival

Investing for Survival

Take emotion out of it You should look over your portfolio two to four times a year. In my own case, I follow a very structured process. I take all of the investment ideas that I have gathered up since my last portfolio pruning, and rate them on valuation, momentum, and accounting quality to arrive at a composite measure of their overall desirability. I compare these ideas to the companies that are already in my portfolio.

This sounds complicated and so it is. But exactly how you do your ranking is less important than having a system for comparing the stocks in your existing portfolio to the alternatives that the market is offering you. Your goal should to take some of the emotion out of investing. You don’t want to fall in love with the companies that you already own. To avoid this, I try to pinpoint what companies in my ideas list are better than the median idea in my portfolio.  These become purchase candidates and I do further research on them.

I also look at the companies in my portfolio that are below the median in desirability, and I ask why I’m keeping them. In many cases, the companies are less desirable because they’ve gone up in price and are no longer as cheap as the once were. In other cases, they’re less desirable for the opposite reason— the company’s business has deteriorated and shows no signs of turning around. Every three to four months, I typically sell two or three companies from my 35-stock list and replace them with more promising companies from the ideas list. I typically hold a stock for three years.  Many of my ideas go against me at first, but often turn and make money for me later.


The Morning Call--As if global economic weaken weren't enough

The Morning Call

9/24/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 17055, S&P 1982) had another weak day.  The Dow fell back below the 17158 (upper boundaries of short and intermediate term trading ranges).  Under our time and distance discipline that negates the break of the intermediate term trend---hence, it remains in a trading range (15132-17158). 

The short term trend is a bit trickier because the time element was met yesterday; and I re-set the trend to up.  That said, it was negated after only one day.   In addition, it shared the same upper boundary with the intermediate term.  In circumstances like this, I usually find a compromise.  In this case, if the Dow closes below 17158 today, I will return the short term trend to up (16608-19000); if not, then it remains in a trading range (16332-17158).  The Dow is still in its long term uptrend (5148-18484) and above its 50 day moving average.

            The S&P remained in uptrends across all time frames: short term (1955-2146), intermediate term (1922-2722) and long term (771-20200.

            Volume was up slightly; breadth was mixed.  The VIX jumped again; this time by 9%.  However, it remained within short and intermediate term downtrends and above its 50 day moving average.

            And (short):
           
            The long Treasury was up for a third day in a row, finishing within short and intermediate term trading ranges; and it closed back above its 50 day moving average.  However, it is developing a head and shoulders formation---which would be negative for TLT if the pattern is completed.

            Fears of a broken bond market (medium):

            GLD inched higher but remained within very short term, short term and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line: the Dow fell back below the 17158 level, failing to confirm the break of its intermediate term trading range and calling into question the successful challenge of its short term trading range.  I am going to let the Market tell me if that break was real or a false flag. However this price pattern works itself out, I think it makes clear how difficult the going to the upside has become.  There is, of course, some small probability that we have just witnessed the top---the operative word being ‘small’.  More realistically, the indices will likely continue to struggle to the upside; though the longer they try and fail, the more likely that a top is being formed.

The long bond continues to shrug off its initial hawkish reaction to the FOMC/Yellen monetary policy statement.  One explanation is a stronger dollar which itself is a function of weakening in the EU, Japanese and Chinese economies.  Another is that the FOMC will in fact tighten monetary policy sooner than expected.  Yet another is some combination of both of the above.  So you can see why I remain confused.  The good news is that we will know the answer soon enough.  Until then our forecast remains unchanged.

Our strategy remains to Sell stocks that are near or at their Sell Half Range or whose underlying company’s fundamentals have deteriorated.
           
    Fundamental
    
        Headlines

            Yesterday’s US economic data flow was neutral: the US September Markit PMI came in below estimates, weekly retail sales were mixed and the September Richmond Fed manufacturing index was better than anticipated.  Let’s hope for more improvement. 

            Overseas, the September EU PMI declined while the Chinese PMI was above forecasts.  Ditto on more improvement.

            ***overnight, the September German business conditions index declined for the fifth month in a row.

            On the political front, two things happened:

(1)   the US started bombing Syria.  Military conflicts often give investors the willies; and this one is particularly risky, because (1) we are not bombing the Syrian regime [even though it crossed one of Obama’s red lines and He wants it replaced]; we are bombing ISIS, (2) the principal reason for not bombing the Syrian regime is that it has some major supporters [Iran, Russian, China] that may already be involved and could become even more so, if the US gets too aggressive, and (3) the chaos of war; which is to say that war plans always look great on paper; but once the first shot is fired, circumstances change usually in a most unexpected way.  That is why there are always so many friendly fire casualties.  No one meant to kill/injure them; but it happens because there are a lot of guys running/driving/sailing/flying around with deadly weapons and imperfect knowledge.  My point here is, what do you think the odds are of an attack that accidentally kills Syrian regime personnel or even worse, Russian/Chinese/Iranian friendlies?  Hint, it is not zero.  Hence, the willies.

Syria becomes the seventh country to be bombed by a Nobel Peace Prize          winner (short):

(2)   the US government announced that it would revise the tax laws as they apply to inversions.  As I understand those changes, they will subject the inverting US company’s earnings to US tax law for slightly longer than it otherwise would have been.  In other words, nothing onerous or likely to stop or prevent future transactions.  However, it did have the desired psychological effect on investors as stocks in inversion-related transactions took it in the snoot.

Bottom line: the economic news was a bit friendlier yesterday, but politics got in the way---giving investors all that they needed to keep the selling momentum alive.  That said, I don’t think that the changes in taxing inversions are much more than rhetoric, so I see little fallout.  On the other hand, gosh only knows what the consequences of our new Middle East policy will be.  While I don’t see how they can be anything but worse than they were before the bombing started, I don’t know enough about ISIS true capabilities to be making doomsday predictions.

Whatever occurs, both represent a potential added burden on our economy which is already having enough trouble dealing with the issues associated with declining economic activity in three of our major trading partners.  I don’t see how the US economy can continue to stand tall in the face of weakening global economic activity and unfriendly government monetary/fiscal/regulatory policy.  Sooner or later, I believe that some number, some incident is going to pop the balloon of overvaluation.  I am clueless as to which one it will be.  But the yellow light is flashing.

My bottom line is that for current prices to hold, it requires a perfect outcome to the numerous problems facing the US and global economies AND investor willingness to accept the compression of future potential returns into current prices.

 I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.

            The latest from John Hussman (medium):

            How he Fed is killing emerging market’s (medium):

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Boeing (BA) 2014 Review

Boeing Co. is a leading manufacturer of commercial aircraft, business jets, military aircraft as well as variety of command and control and advanced radar systems.  The company has grown profits and dividends at a 9-10% annual rate over the past 10 years earning a return on equity in excess of 20%. 

The key factor in BA’s financial performance of late has been the 787 Dreamliner.  While the company was initially plagued with delays, those problems appear to have been corrected and back log now stands at approximately 5200 and should keep Boeing at full production for years.  Other positive factors include:

(1) an underlying demand driven by increasing commercial air travel and the need to reduce fuel costs are pushing airlines to replace their fleets,

(2) a broadly diversified defense business that has strong bookings and a rising backlog,

(3) strong international demand for its defense products,

(4) an ongoing stock buy back program.

Negatives:

(1) a large percentage of its sales are to governments and therefore subject to cutbacks as budgets are tightened,

(2) most of its contracts are fixed price, hence requiring constant vigilance in holding costs down,

(3) mounting competition against its 737.

            Boeing is rated A++ by Value Line, has a 33% debt to equity ratio (though this is largely a function of accounting treatments) and its stock yields 2.3%.

Statistical Summary

                 Stock      Dividend         Payout      # Increases  
                Yield      Growth Rate        Ratio       Since 2004

BA             2.3%           15%             44%               8
Ind Ave     1.8                9*               26                 NA 

               Debt/                       EPS Down       Net        Value Line
               Equity         ROE      Since 2004      Margin       Rating

BA            33%            33%            2                6%           A++
Ind Ave     40               16              NA              8             NA

*most companies in BA industry do not pay a dividend

      Chart

            Note: BA stock made great progress off its March 2009 low, quickly surpassing the downtrend off its September 2007 high (straight red line) and the November 2008 trading high (green line).  BA is in uptrends across all timeframes: long term (blue lines), intermediate term (purple lines) and short term (brown line).  The wiggly red line is the 50 day moving average.  The Dividend Growth and High Yield Portfolios own 90% positions in BA.  The upper boundary of its Buy Value Range is $73; the lower boundary of its Sell Half Range is $199.




9/14