Friday, February 28, 2014

The Morning Call---Now for the follow through

The Morning Call

2/28/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16272, S&P 1854) traded up yesterday.  The Dow finished with its short ((15330-16601) and intermediate (14696-16601) term trading ranges.  The S&P closed above the upper boundary of its short term trading range (1746-1848---I know I have been carrying this as 1858.  Apparently, sometime in the past I transcribed the number and then subsequently didn’t catch my error).  That starts the clock on our time and distance discipline which requires the S&P to remain above this level until the close next Wednesday.  As you can see, even if the break is validated, it would leave the Averages out of sync on their short term trends---which would leave the Market in a no man’s land with respect to its short term trend.

            Intermediate term, the S&P is in an uptrend (1721-2501).  Both of the Averages are above their 50 day moving averages and are in long term uptrends (5050-17400, 736-1910).

            Volume was flat; breadth improved.  The VIX fell leaving it within a short term trading range and an intermediate term downtrend and below its 50 day moving average.  Finally, I checked out our internal indicator at yesterday’s close.  In a Universe of 155 stocks, 43 finished either at or above their all-time highs, 112 did not.  Clearly this is not supportive of an upside breakout.

            Update on sentiment (short):

            The long Treasury moved up, staying within its short term trading range (indeed it is nearing the upper boundary of that range) and its intermediate term downtrend.

            GLD bounced back, finishing within a very short term uptrend but also a short and intermediate term downtrend.   This puppy just doesn’t want to correct.

Bottom line:  the fourth time was a charm for the S&P---it closing above its all-time high.  There are a number of caveats to this action: (1) volume was puny, (2) out internal indicator was hardly supportive, (3) if confirmed, this will leave the Averages out of sync---which leaves the Market trendless and (4) under our time and distance discipline, this challenge won’t be confirmed until next Wednesday [time] or the S&P advances to 1885 [distance] whichever comes first. 

Meanwhile, there is really not much to do save using any price strength that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly.

Another good investing lesson from Todd Harrison (short):

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            We finally got a data day that could be characterized as mixed (I can’t remember the last time that I was able to make that characterization): January durable orders were down less than anticipated, though December orders were revised lower; the February  Kansas City manufacturing index came in better than expected; but weekly jobless claims were above estimates.  I don’t want to get too jiggy about a single mixed day, but at least we finally have some positive datapoints.

            In other US news, Yellen testified before the senate yesterday, but little new came from it.  Two minor points: (1) she did acknowledge that the economic data has been a bit weaker than expected but attributed much of it to the weather---hence, expect no near term action from the Fed stemming from the economy and (2) she gave no further guidance on the expected changes in forward guidance.

            The problem with Fed policy (medium and today’s must read):

            BoA on the weather’s impact on the economic data (short):

            Overseas, the Chinese yuan continued to push lower---a major negative for the carry trade---and the tension in Ukraine remained at a high pitch.  On the latter point, I am not so much worried about what occurs internally or any spillover economic impact on the rest of the world (Ukraine is small, poor and its debt is not widely held) as I am about the risks of some kind of international showdown between the US and Russia.  To be clear, I don’t think that there will be shots fired; no what worries me is that Obama and/or Kerry draws another line in the sand; and Putin just doesn’t push back but creates a crisis from which Obama/Kerry have no choice but to back down and the US loses face big time.  I don’t think that would be good for investor morale. 

Bottom line: the S&P unquestionably took out its old high, although not dramatically so.  On the one hand, there were a number of non-supportive technical factors which I listed above.  On the other hand, the advance was in the face of rising tensions around Ukraine and Yellen sticking with tapering.  So at the moment, I have every reason to believe that the current challenge has as strong a likelihood of being confirmed as any other.  The one thing that has to happen is that breadth has to catch up to price; but again there is no reason at the moment to assume that it won’t. 

If the Averages do take out their highs, then the next target is the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends.  However, those levels are so close that I don’t see a lot of reward for spending cash reserves; and when I compare it to the downside risk due to significant overvaluation, there is no incentive for me to get off the sidelines.

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.


            It is a cautionary note not to chase a rally if it occurs.





Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment