Thursday, April 10, 2014

The Morning Call--The ongoing litany of Fed obfuscation

The Morning Call

4/10/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16437, S&P 1872) responded robustly yesterday to the release of the latest FOMC meeting minutes.  The S&P closed within uptrends across all timeframes: short (1802-1979), intermediate (1752-2552) and long (739-1920).  In addition, it touched its 50 day moving average and bounced strongly.  The Dow remained within short (15330-16601) and intermediate (14696-16601) term trading ranges and a long term uptrend (5050-17400).  The focus now is on the extent of the follow through.  However, until the Dow makes a new high, the Averages will continue out of sync in their short and intermediate term trends---which leaves the Market trendless.

            Volume fell (a recurring pattern); breadth was mixed (surprising for such a powerful up price day).  The VIX unsurprisingly fell, finishing within its short term trading range and intermediate term downtrend and below its 50 day moving average.

            The long Treasury fell, closing right on the upper boundary of its short term trading range, hinting that it might again have given a false breakout.  As you might expect, I am holding off making a confirmation call.  The good news is that it remains within its very short term uptrend and above its 50 day moving average.  The bad news is that the high on the current break is below the high from the previous break (hence, a lower high) and it continues to trade within an intermediate term downtrend.

            GLD rose, remaining within its short and intermediate term downtrends but closed right on its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line:  however mediocre Tuesday’s pin action, yesterday certainly made up for it.  It was seemingly driven primarily by a very dovish message in the latest FOMC minutes.  Importantly, follow through is key.  If the promise of money for nothing generates enough enthusiasm to overcome the numerous developing divergences, then the Averages are most likely on their way to a challenge of the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends.  However, if the FOMC statement was simply an excuse to relieve an oversold condition, then the directionless volatility of late will probably continue.

Whatever the case, given the proximity of the Averages to the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends and the degree of stock overvaluation (as calculated by our Model), there is really not much to do save using any price strength that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly.

            Another opinion on the markets I watch (short):

            The Market’s historical performance during and after Passover (short):

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            The economic data flow this week remains sparse.  Yesterday in the US, mortgage applications were reported down but the more important purchase applications number was up and wholesale inventories and sales were up.  Overseas, February German exports fell. 

            ***overnight, Japanese machine orders were down big, Chinese March exports fell 6.6%, imports declined 11.3% and the Chinese government said that there was no new stimulus plans.

            Ordinarily, these stats would be of little significance.  Yesterday, they went unnoticed largely because the minutes from the latest FOMC meeting portrayed a much more dovish Fed than currently assumed.  What is puzzling to me is that this Fed meeting took place before Yellen’s ‘six months’ comments and the subsequent Fed member dovish/hawkish dialogue that has to date so confused investors.  In other words, this supposedly clarifying discussion took place before the ensuing string of perplexingly contradictory statements from various Fed members. 

Given the pin action, it seems that investors decided to ignore all the recent evidence that doesn’t comport to [a] the most out of date policy statement and/or [b] the original market driving thesis of QEInfinity {i.e. don’t fight the Fed}.  If this is the correct interpretation, then while it might give the stock guys a short term buzz, I think it will raise not only the probability of the Fed bungling the transition to a normalized monetary but also the ultimate pain that will have to be endured in that transition process.

On the other hand, if this was just an excuse to relieve an oversold market, then it will soon be relegated to the ongoing litany of Fed obfuscation. 

Bottom line: investors seemed perfectly clear in their reaction to the FOMC minutes though I was somewhat puzzled.  That doesn’t mean that investors aren’t correct or that the Fed isn’t as dovish as they believe.  It is just that I would feel more comfortable with that interpretation after a few more signs that all the intervening confusion was just s big mistake. 

If we assume that investors are correct, then I believe that the longer term outlook for the economy has deteriorated---in that, the Fed will be prolonging a policy that is  ineffective at best and counterproductive at worse and that will ultimate increase the pain of normalization.

Of course, in the meantime, the music will keep playing and the punch bowl remain full. That said, as I noted above, even if I was bullish right now, I would want to be sure that the Market’s positive interpretation of Fed policy is correct before committing to chasing prices higher.

For me, pushing stocks to even more overvalued levels is not the right prescription for capital preservation.

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.

            Percentage of assets in bullish funds at a high (short):

            Four reasons to have contingency plans (medium):

            Excellent article on managing risk and return (medium):

            Dare to look wrong (medium):

            The case for bonds (medium):

            Greece prices a new long bond offering below 5%.  This is about as good an example of the current irrational exuberance that I could think of: (short):

            Citi on the current leverage in the financial system (medium):

      Investing for Survival

            Twenty tips for a better life (medium):





Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.


Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment