Wednesday, January 8, 2014

The Morning Call---The senate doesn't get it

The Morning Call

1/8/14 
The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16530, S&P 1837) put in a rebound yesterday, remaining within major uptrends across all timeframes: short term (15690-20690, 1774-1930), intermediate term (15690-20690, 1676-2257) and long term (5050-17400, 728-1900).  However, related to the January effect, stocks are still down through the first four trading days of the year.

            Volume fell; breadth improved.  The VIX declined, finishing within its short term trading range and intermediate term and continuing to provide little information on stock price direction.

            January sentiment survey (a bit long but a must read):

            The long Treasury rose, closing within its short term trading range, its intermediate term downtrend and continuing to build a head and shoulders formation.

            GLD fell but remained above the upper boundary of a very short term downtrend.  Nevertheless, it is also well within short and intermediate term downtrends.

Bottom line:  yesterday, the Averages recovered some of its early 2014 losses but are still down for the year.  By rule, the January effect ends today.  So it will be interesting to see how stocks close.  As I noted yesterday, there are plenty of technical reasons for stocks to continue their advance even if the January effect proves negative.  If so, my target is still the upper boundaries of the indices long term uptrends (17400, 1900).

In any case I will continue to use any advance as an opportunity for our Portfolios to take advantage of our Sell Price Discipline.

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            Yesterday was quiet.  US economic data was comprised of secondary indicators: the November US trade deficit was smaller than expected (think declining energy imports) and weekly retail sales were mixed.  Nothing there.

            On the political front, the senate passed a procedural motion that allows debate to begin on the six month extension of the unemployment benefits (the eleventh time in five years for those counting) ---which, of course, potentially (depending on where they get the funds) busts the budget agreement made a mere month ago.  To be sure, the house also has a vote and it has been a bit more miserly than our illustrious senior body. 

Forgetting the argument about the economic soundness of said policy and whether or how the house responds, if an extension is approved, it would be a perfect example of why fiscal policy remains high up on our list of potential risks to the economy.  I can understand some dyed in the wool liberal proposing an extension (despite the fact that the prior ten did no good) of unemployment benefits; but if the senate approves, it speaks to the fact that these guys just don’t get it; and until they are replaced with those who do, our government will go ever deeper into debt, consume an ever larger percent of the country’s productive capacity and create a burden our children and grandchildren can not possibly pay.
           
The media and pundits paid little attention to that and spent the day contemplating today’s release of the minutes from the last FOMC meeting and Friday’s nonfarm payroll report and its potential impact on Fed policy.  Judging by the pin action, investors are either convinced of a goldilocks scenario or they are too busy counting their chips to care.
           
            The problem with Fed policy (medium and today’s must read):

Bottom line:  I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            The latest from John Hussman (medium):

            Will capital spending propel the economy in 2014? (medium):

            



Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment