The Morning Call
The Market
Technical
The
indices (DJIA 15618, S&P 1763) took a rest yesterday---which is not
surprising given its dramatically overbought condition. Both of the Averages are within their short
term uptrends (15174-20174, 1698-1852), their intermediate term uptrends
(15174-20174, 1615-2197) and long term uptrends (5015-17000, 728-1850).
Volume
was anemic, breadth weak. In a very
volatile session, the VIX finished up fractionally, remaining within its short
term trading range and intermediate term downtrend.
The
long Treasury traded off but closed within its short term trading range and
intermediate term downtrend and continues to build a reverse head and shoulders
pattern.
GLD
declined, but stayed within its very short term uptrend. However, it is also within a short and
intermediate term downtrends.
Bottom
line: the Averages had a rough day, though it was on pathetic
volume; plus they are quite overbought. So the pin action was not that
concerning. However, I repeat my caveat
that the Dow has reversed quickly following the prior two penetrations of
15550.
Barring a
dramatic reversal in the very short term, I view the upper boundaries of the
indices long term uptrends (17000/1850) as the most likely upside
objectives. My technical conclusion is
that the equities could be Bought for a short term trade, but only by the most
skilled of traders and not without the use of tight stops.
That said, my
focus is on our Sell Discipline: if one of our stocks trades into its Sell
Half Range ,
our Portfolios will act accordingly.
Market
performance following FOMC meetings (short):
Three
facts about the current Market (medium):
More
on Market sentiment (short):
Citi
warn of Market disconnects (medium):
More
on Puerto Rican debt (medium):
Slowdown
in the emerging markets? (medium):
Update
on sentiment (short):
Most
over extended stocks (short):
Fundamental
Headlines
Yesterday’s
US economic news was mixed: the ADP private
payroll report was very negative, the September CPI
came in as anticipated and mortgage and purchase applications were up. Investors reacted principally to the ADP
number and sold off slowly in early trading.
In
the early afternoon, the FOMC released the policy description statement
following the close of its meeting. It
wasn’t all that different from its predecessor: economy continues to improve,
inflation is under control, no change in the Fed Funds rate, no tapering. Although a prior comment on tightening
financial conditions (the September pre-tapering sell off) was absent---which
investors interpreted as mildly bearish (i.e. less need to ease). Hence, a more intense round of selling began
in the afternoon.
Nevertheless,
as I noted above, the decline was pretty calm and came from an overbought
condition. So I wouldn’t read too much
into the pin action. On the other hand,
as I discussed in last week’s Closing Bell, one way the transition from easy to
tight money can began is from the Market’s loss of faith that the Fed can
manage it smoothly; so it takes rates up on its own. But we have no idea what would prompt that
loss of faith. I speculated that it
could be the tightening from another central bank (our discussion focused on China ). But it could just as easily be investor
exhaustion with the whole process---which is sort of reflective of the Market’s
behavior yesterday.
Or
maybe it comes from the only country printing money faster than the US
(medium):
I
am not trying to make a prediction here.
I am just saying that with monetary policy in Never Never Land, you just
don’t know what will drive the reversal (I’m also clearly talking my book).
The
latest from Paul Singer (medium and today’s must read):
Bottom
line: I remain confident in the Fair
Values generated by our Valuation Model---meaning that stocks are overvalued. And I think that the end of the current up
Market will most likely come from an unraveling of the Fed’s unsuccessful,
dangerously experimental monetary policy.
Hence,
I believe that the equities uptrend is living on borrowed time. The technicals suggest that there could be
one more last blow off; and some traders may want to play it. As a trader, I would keep my stops very tight. But I would prefer to sell calls against my
positions or buy puts on stocks that I wanted to own rather than taking an
outright position.
As an investor,
I would be sure that (1) I had cash reserves, (2) I took advantage of the gift
being given me [i.e. high prices] to sell anything that gives me pause and (3)
our Portfolios continued to follow their Sell Discipline.
Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.
No comments:
Post a Comment