The Morning Call
The Market
Technical
The
indices (DJIA 13900, S&P 1496) rebounded yesterday, though the pin action
was largely that of an oversold bounce.
The Market is starting to give the impression that it is drifting into
another one of its schizophrenic phases (lots of volatility, no
direction). That said, the Averages
remain within their (1) short term uptrends [13509-14164, 1469-1539] and (2)
intermediate term uptrends [13410-18410, 1421-2015].
Volume
declined; breadth recovered. The VIX
fell but finished within both a short term and intermediate term downtrend.
GLD
rallied hard, though it is well within its short term downtrend. The recent recovery has been on above average
volume, suggesting the potential that we have seen the lows. However, we won’t know or consider taking
action until the current short term downtrend has been successfully challenged.
Bottom line: the
recent churn on better volume is suggestive of a pitched battle between the
bulls and bears and/or, more ominously, a topping process. We likely won’t know which for a while; but
the erratic pin action relieves somewhat the pressure of being under invested. For the moment, equities remain in a
technical uptrend---and will remain so until they are not.
If investors are
rethinking their overactive optimism, the Averages will tell us when given the
chance to challenge those uptrends. If
not, our Portfolios will continue to Sell into rising prices.
The
lead/lag report (medium):
Market
performance in post election years (short):
Major correction or bear
trap? (short):
Fundamental
Headlines
Lots
of economic data was reported yesterday and it was universally good: weekly
retail sales showed growth, the Case Shiller home price index was up more than
expected, new home sales were very strong as was consumer confidence and the
Richmond Fed’s manufacturing index was up versus estimates that it would be
negative. In sum, very supportive of our
forecast and clearly a reason for investors’ positive mood.
Bernanke
kept the party going by:
(1) promising to keep the presses running into infinity and shrugging
off the risks associated with an ‘all in’ liquidity surge. As long as all that money remains as reserves
on bank balance sheets, he will be correct.
But when, as and if velocity ever picks up, he [and the rest of us] will
have a problem,
(2) doubling down by supporting the doomsayers on sequestration. Given the Keynesian economic model and
orientation of the Fed staff, this opinion is not a surprise. I was a bit taken back that Bernanke ventured
into fiscal policy---something the Fed normally eschews. I can understand that if he believes that the
economy could weaken and worries that everyone will be looking at the Fed for
even more ease to offset that weakness, then he would rightfully be nervous
about expanding the Fed’s balance sheet beyond its current gluttonous and ever
growing size.
Frankly, the
only reason that I even care about Bernanke’s opinion on sequestration is the
extent to which he could influence the GOP determination to hold fast. Obama will likely be blitzing the media with
Bernanke’s comments and urging the public to pressure their congressmen to ease
up. The good news is that He only has
two days to do it. The line in the sand
is still there.
Must read
excerpts from Bernanke’s testimony (medium):
Bernanke
downplays the risks of too easy money (medium):
And
how about this for a troublesome chart (short):
And finally,
this from Charles Biderman (5 minute video):
Investors chose
to ignore the potential fall out from the Italian elections---probably because
no one seems to know exactly how things will play out. However, the Italian and Spanish bond markets
paid attention and the result was whackage.
My guess is that the political crisis in Italy
won’t be disregarded by US investors for long.
Can the euro
exist without a fiscal union (medium):
What the Germans
think (medium):
But how much of
a euro disaster is already priced into stocks?
Good point. (short):
Bottom
line: yesterday’s economic data was
welcome after a period of more ‘mixed’ results.
Bernanke’s re-emphasis of monetary easing was not surprising, though his
pitch for backing off sequestration concerns me. If Obama uses it to successfully bludgeon
republicans into backing off their stance, it would be.....unfortunate.
Just because
investors elected to overlook the potential financial problems that could
result from an anti austerity administration in Rome
doesn’t mean that they don’t exist.
I like our cash
position.
Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Strategic Stock Investments is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.
No comments:
Post a Comment