Wednesday, April 25, 2018

The Morning Call---Au contraire, monsieur


The Morning Call

4/25/18

The Market
         
    Technical

After a one day rest, the indices (DJIA 24024, S&P 2634) continued their decline, continuing to retreat from their challenge last week of their 100 day moving averages. Volume increased; breadth was very poor.   The S&P ended within a very short term downtrend.  While the Dow had negated its downtrend, it is now back below the former upper boundary, raising the question as to whether that break was a false flag.  Both finished below their 100 day moving averages but above their 200 day moving averages (yesterday, I mistakenly said that they were below that MA).  The DJIA closed in a short term trading range but in intermediate and long term uptrends.  The S&P is in uptrends across all timeframes. The short term technical picture remains cloudy.  Longer term, the assumption is that equity prices will continue to rise.
               
                Not surprisingly, the VIX was up 11%, remaining above its 100 and 200 day moving averages and the lower boundary of its short term trading range.
               
The long Treasury continued its decline, ending below its 100 and 200 day moving averages and in a short term downtrend.  It closed right on the lower boundary of its long term uptrend, a breach of which would have major technical significance as it would mark the end of a thirty year decline.

The dollar paused its three day run to the upside, closing down fractionally.  It still ended above the upper boundary of its intermediate term downtrend for the third day (if it remains there through the close today, it will reset to a trading range) and above its 100 day moving average (if it remains there through the close today, it will revert to support).  UUP remains below its 200 day moving average but it is very close to challenging it.
               
GLD was up ½ %, but still finished below the lower boundary of its short term uptrend (if it remains there through the close today, it will reset to a trading range).  It remained above its 100 and 200 day moving averages. 

Bottom line: Monday morning, I posed the question, was the dramatic change in direction last Thursday/Friday for most of the indicators a sign of a major shift in the economic/Market narrative or just noise.  The pin action that day did little to address that question as the indices closed mix and near the flat line. 

In pre-Market trading yesterday, equity prices were spiking, suggesting the answer was noise.  Then the bottom fell out, suggesting the opposite.  At this point, both of the Averages are near to challenging their 200 day moving averages. 

Backing up a bit, I have previously observed that the indices were stuck in a range capped by their 100 day moving averages and the upper boundary of their very short term downtrend and bordered on the downside by their 200 day moving averages.  And I opined that a break out of this range would have directional implications. 

Early last week, the Averages challenged the upper boundary of that range and failed.  Now it appears that they are about to challenge its lower boundary.  And that range is narrowing.

Putting this altogether, the direction that the indices break out of the aforementioned narrowing range could provide, at least, an indication of the answer to ‘major shift in the Market narrative’ versus the ‘noise’ question.

            Oil tumbles on Macron proposal (short):

    Fundamental

       Headlines

            Yesterday’s economic stats were slightly upbeat: March new home sales were strong, April consumer confidence was higher than anticipated, the February Case Shiller home price index rose more than expected (you can decide if this is good or bad news); meanwhile, month to day retail chain store sales growth declined and the April Richmond Fed manufacturing index was extremely disappointing.
      
            Bonds (interest rates) continued to hold investor focus as the ten year Treasury pierced the 3% psychological level even though it didn’t hold.  Still, the concerns that I outlined in yesterday’s Morning Call (flat/inverted yield curve, recession, tightening Fed) were exacerbated.  As you know, the slowing economy, rising commodity prices, increasing debt offering and a tightening Fed are my major worries.  Not because I believe that the US economy is necessarily going into a recession but as a result of the impact that the above factors will have on mispriced and misallocated assets---not the least of which is stocks. 

            The other attention grabbing event was the Caterpillar earnings conference call in which the CEO said that the first quarter (2018) was likely ‘the high water mark’ for earnings.  Suddenly, ‘peak earnings’ became a theme of the day. 

You may remember a couple of weeks ago, I opined that while a very positive first quarter earnings season was the most anticipated (well discounted) earnings season in a long time, it would likely still serve as a prop to the Market.  Au contraire, monsieur.  To date, a third of the S&P companies have reported, 80% have beaten upwardly revised earnings and prices are down.  That suggests that a lot of good news had been priced into stocks; and the Market may have reached the ‘what have you done for me lately’ point.  In other words, what is going to prompt investors to pay increased valuations for equities which are already at record highs?   I am sure that there may be an answer out there, I just don’t see it.  So the big question is, will ‘peak earnings’ be a short lived theme or is it an ‘emperor’s new clothes’ moment?
           
Bottom line: my fundamental unease is with the performance of the economy (which has not been awe inspiring of late), the direction of inflation (which commodity prices as well as the long bond are starting to point to the upside) and Fed policy (which is tightening).  That combo, historically, has not been great for stocks.  I am very comfortable with my cash position.

            The anatomy of a ‘bubble’ (long):

            Goldman warns of declining Market liquidity (medium):

    News on Stocks in Our Portfolios
 
Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO): Q1 EPS of $0.47 beats by $0.01.
Revenue of $7.6B (-16.8% Y/Y) beats by $290M.

Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT): Q1 EPS of $2.82 beats by $0.75.
Revenue of $12.9B (+31.4% Y/Y) beats by $970M.

3M (NYSE:MMM): Q1 EPS of $2.50 misses by $0.01.
Revenue of $8.28B (+7.8% Y/Y) beats by $30M.

Sherwin Williams (NYSE:SHW): Q1 EPS of $3.57 beats by $0.41.
Revenue of $3.97B (+43.8% Y/Y) beats by $20M.

United Technologies (NYSE:UTX): Q1 EPS of $1.77 beats by $0.26.
Revenue of $15.2B (+10.1% Y/Y) beats by $580M

General Dynamics (NYSE:GD): Q1 EPS of $2.65 beats by $0.17.
Revenue of $7.54B (+1.3% Y/Y) misses by $20M.

T. Rowe Price (NASDAQ:TROW): Q1 EPS of $1.74 beats by $0.04.
Revenue of $1.33B (+17.7% Y/Y) beats by $50M.

Boeing (NYSE:BA): Q1 EPS of $3.64 beats by $1.05.
Revenue of $23.4B (+6.6% Y/Y) beats by $1.18B.


Economics

   This Week’s Data

      US

            Month to date retail chain store sales grew slower than in the prior week.

            March new home sales rose 4.0% versus expectations of up 1.9%.

            April consumer confidence came in at 128.7 versus estimates of 126.1.

            The April Richmond Fed manufacturing index was reported at -3 versus forecasts of +16.

                Weekly mortgage applications fell 0.2%, while purchase applications were flat with the prior week.

     International

    Other

            Congress trying to do its part in deregulation (short):

            QE failed in Japan (medium):

            China concerned that its economic growth rate could slow (medium):

What I am reading today

            One of the best ways to maximize your retirement income (medium):

            How Nick Saban wins (medium):

            How valuable is your ‘digital self’? (medium):


Visit Investing for Survival’s website (http://investingforsurvival.com/home) to learn more about our Investment Strategy, Prices Disciplines and Subscriber Service.




No comments:

Post a Comment