Wednesday, April 9, 2014

The Morning Call---Handling bad news with equanimity

The Morning Call

4/9/14

The Market
           
    Technical

            The indices (DJIA 16256, S&P 1857) rebounded yesterday, though I thought it rather meek given the extent to which they were oversold.  The S&P closed within uptrends across all timeframes: short (1802-1979), intermediate (1752-2552) and long (739-1920).  The Dow remained within short (15330-16601) and intermediate (14696-16601) term trading ranges and a long term uptrend (5050-17400).  This respite keeps the technical damage limited; but the Averages continue out of sync in their short and intermediate term trends---which leaves the Market trendless.

            Volume fell (as it seems to do on up days); breadth improved.  The VIX declined, finishing within its short term trading range and intermediate term downtrend and above its 50 day moving average.

            The long Treasury was up again, closing for the second day above the upper boundary of its short term trading range.  Under our discipline, the break will be confirmed at the end of trading today; but as I said yesterday, given the recent false breakout, I will likely wait till Thursday or Friday to make the call.  I also reiterate that a big improvement in bond prices probably does not bode well for stocks.  TLT remained within a very short term uptrend, above its 50 day moving average but within an intermediate term downtrend.

            A look at the high yield market (medium):

            GLD lifted a bit in trading but is still within short and intermediate term downtrends and below its 50 day moving average.

Bottom line:  yesterday’s price rebound was not that much to get excited about given current oversold condition of stocks.  I think that it likely reflects the growing level of uncertainty as depicted in the numerous divergences to which I frequently allude.   As a result, trading will probably stay choppy; though I think that the bulls have enough residual strength that they can mount a challenge to the upper boundaries of the Averages long term uptrends.

On the other hand, the bears are going to have to mount some serious selling to breach the lower boundaries of the indices’ short and intermediate term trends.  Until that happens, the assumption has to be that stocks are either consolidating or heading higher.      That said, given the proximity of the Averages to the upper boundaries of their long term uptrends and the degree of stock overvaluation (as calculated by our Model), there is really not much to do save using any price strength that pushes one of our stocks into its Sell Half Range and to act accordingly.

            A thought experiment (short and a must read):

    Fundamental
    
     Headlines

            Yesterday was another relatively quiet day, news wise:

(1)   US economic news included an upbeat small business optimism index as well as positive weekly retail sales.  These are both secondary indicators; so by themselves they are not going to challenge ours outlook.  Nonetheless, they do provide support.

****overnight, US regulators increased the capital requirements for large banks and February German exports fell 1.3%.

(2)   political turmoil continues in the Ukraine with both sides accusing the other of encouraging their followers to instigate violence.  However the headlines read when this crisis is over, I feel reasonably sure that the Russians will be happy with the outcome,

                 The latest from Ukraine:

(3)   in the absence of news, the Market itself has become the story/headline as the universe debates valuations and direction.  This circumstance is likely to last only as long as there is nothing else for investors to focus on---the most immediate candidate being the just started earnings season.

Bottom line: the US economy continues to perform unbelievably well given that the Fed policy is about as far out on a limb as it could get and the ruling class proves every day that its sole objective is re-election.  In addition, the rest of the global has been able to handle its collective problems with little to no extended fallout; though to be clear problems abound in China, Japan, the EU, the Middle East and Ukraine.

An optimist on China.  He seems to be relying on the same factor as the Fed optimists, to wit, that the power elite are smart enough to extricate themselves from tough situations with manageable fallout.  I can’t remember; how did that work in 2008?

            Another Chinese bond default (medium):

            Draghi’s ‘whatever it takes’ may not be enough (medium and a must read):

                EU bank deal appears to be unraveling (medium):

That the equity market has thus far been able to handle these difficulties with such equanimity is positively astounding, given the magnitude of the gap between current prices and Fair Value (as calculated not just by our Model but numerous others to which I continually link).  That gap, however created, is in my opinion the overriding risk to stocks.

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that I believe that the key investment strategy today is to take advantage of the current high prices to sell any stock that has been a disappointment or no longer fits your investment criteria and to trim the holding of any stock that has doubled or more in price.

            Bear in mind, this is not a recommendation to run for the hills.  Our Portfolios are still 55-60% invested and their cash position is a function of individual stocks either hitting their Sell Half Prices or their underlying company failing to meet the requisite minimum financial criteria needed for inclusion in our Universe.
        
            It is a cautionary note not to chase this rally.

            No one rings a bell at the top (medium and a must read):

            Counterpoint (short):

            Profit margins and stock market reversions (medium):

           
More on equity valuations (medium):

            Great thought on being wrong (short):





Steve Cook received his education in investments from Harvard, where he earned an MBA, New York University, where he did post graduate work in economics and financial analysis and the CFA Institute, where he earned the Chartered Financial Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.


Analysts designation in 1973. His 40 years of investment experience includes institutional portfolio management at Scudder, Stevens and Clark and Bear Stearns. Steve's goal at Investing For Survival is to help other investors build wealth and benefit from the investing lessons he learned the hard way.

No comments:

Post a Comment